Mark Povich

456 total citations
14 papers, 190 citations indexed

About

Mark Povich is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Povich has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 190 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Povich's work include Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers). Mark Povich is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers). Mark Povich collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark Povich's co-authors include Carl F. Craver and Stuart Glennan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy of Science.

In The Last Decade

Mark Povich

13 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Povich United States	7	153	50	49	43	27	14	190
Gabriele Contessa Canada	9	180 1.2×	99 2.0×	90 1.8×	39 0.9×	41 1.5×	26	308
Eric Christian Barnes United States	10	174 1.1×	40 0.8×	101 2.1×	46 1.1×	36 1.3×	26	283
Ioannis Votsis Germany	8	118 0.8×	33 0.7×	32 0.7×	22 0.5×	11 0.4×	22	155
James Nguyen United Kingdom	9	160 1.0×	27 0.5×	48 1.0×	23 0.5×	43 1.6×	16	236
Sorin Bangu Norway	8	125 0.8×	55 1.1×	60 1.2×	14 0.3×	6 0.2×	26	186
Alexander Gebharter Germany	8	190 1.2×	58 1.2×	57 1.2×	55 1.3×	59 2.2×	32	275
Samuel Schindler Denmark	9	151 1.0×	27 0.5×	60 1.2×	27 0.6×	22 0.8×	29	225
Antony Eagle Australia	9	103 0.7×	75 1.5×	61 1.2×	22 0.5×	8 0.3×	19	207
Max Kistler France	8	123 0.8×	76 1.5×	40 0.8×	23 0.5×	14 0.5×	46	217
Chris Daly United Kingdom	9	98 0.6×	106 2.1×	118 2.4×	41 1.0×	8 0.3×	28	218

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Povich

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Povich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Povich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Povich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Povich

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Povich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Povich. The network helps show where Mark Povich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Povich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Povich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Povich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Povich. Mark Povich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Povich, Mark. (2024). A conventionalist account of distinctively mathematical explanation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 171–223. 1 indexed citations

2.

Povich, Mark. (2024). Rules to Infinity. Figshare.

3.

Povich, Mark. (2022). A Scheme Foiled: A Critique of Baron’s Account of Extra-mathematical Explanation. Mind. 132(526). 479–492. 2 indexed citations

4.

Povich, Mark. (2021). Information and explanation: an inconsistent triad and solution. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 11(2). 1 indexed citations

5.

Craver, Carl F., Stuart Glennan, & Mark Povich. (2021). Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited. Synthese. 199(3-4). 8807–8828. 31 indexed citations

6.

Povich, Mark. (2020). Modality and constitution in distinctively mathematical explanations. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 10(3). 7 indexed citations

7.

Povich, Mark. (2019). Model-based cognitive neuroscience: Multifield mechanistic integration in practice. Theory & Psychology. 29(5). 640–656. 6 indexed citations

8.

Povich, Mark. (2019). The Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account of Distinctively Mathematical Explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 72(2). 511–543. 18 indexed citations

9.

Povich, Mark & Carl F. Craver. (2018). Because without Cause: Non-Causal Explanations in Science and Mathematics. The Philosophical Review. 127(3). 422–426. 63 indexed citations

10.

Craver, Carl F. & Mark Povich. (2017). The directionality of distinctively mathematical explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 63. 31–38. 32 indexed citations

11.

Povich, Mark. (2017). Minimal Models and the Generalized Ontic Conception of Scientific Explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 69(1). 117–137. 18 indexed citations

12.

Povich, Mark. (2017). Social Knowledge and Supervenience Revisited. Erkenntnis. 83(5). 1033–1043. 1 indexed citations

13.

Povich, Mark. (2015). Mechanisms and Model-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Philosophy of Science. 82(5). 1035–1046. 8 indexed citations

14.

Povich, Mark. (2014). Mechanisms and Model-based fMRI. PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact