Axiomathes

644 papers and 2.7k indexed citations

About

The 644 papers published in Axiomathes in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Axiomathes usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (223 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (180 papers) and Philosophy (168 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (174 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (139 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Axiomathes are Hans Lenk, Roberto Poli, Mark H. Bickhard, Timothy L. Hubbard, Carita Paradis, Stanley N. Salthe, Nino B. Cocchiarella, A. H. Louie, Mark Reybrouck and Liliana Albertazzi.

In The Last Decade

Axiomathes

452 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Axiomathes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Axiomathes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Axiomathes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Axiomathes more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Axiomathes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Axiomathes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Axiomathes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026