Janet Cockburn

5.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
55 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

Janet Cockburn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Cockburn has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 9 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Janet Cockburn's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). Janet Cockburn is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). Janet Cockburn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Jordan. Janet Cockburn's co-authors include Peter W. Halligan, B Wilson, Barbara A. Wilson, Helen Dawes, Emad Al-Yahya, Ken Howells, Andrea Dennis, L. A. Smith, Alan Baddeley and V.A. Moar and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Stroke and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Janet Cockburn

54 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Cognitive motor interfere... 1987 2026 2000 2013 2010 1987 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Cockburn United Kingdom 29 1.8k 1.3k 805 769 509 55 4.0k
Elliot Sprecher Israel 40 1.5k 0.9× 1.3k 1.0× 309 0.4× 357 0.5× 192 0.4× 109 5.3k
Sandra K. Hunter United States 51 1.6k 0.9× 619 0.5× 886 1.1× 551 0.7× 76 0.1× 177 8.4k
Avraham Schweiger Israel 26 768 0.4× 1.1k 0.9× 306 0.4× 872 1.1× 329 0.6× 45 2.7k
Gilles Allali Switzerland 42 960 0.5× 2.9k 2.2× 914 1.1× 2.8k 3.7× 183 0.4× 221 6.4k
Mark D. Bishop United States 42 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 430 0.5× 436 0.6× 63 0.1× 157 6.2k
Tarja Pohjasvaara Finland 34 664 0.4× 1.5k 1.1× 1.4k 1.8× 73 0.1× 385 0.8× 56 4.1k
Jane L. Mathias Australia 42 827 0.5× 1.1k 0.9× 173 0.2× 570 0.7× 586 1.2× 106 5.0k
Neha P. Gothe United States 30 861 0.5× 733 0.6× 371 0.5× 287 0.4× 443 0.9× 82 4.0k
Lindsay S. Nagamatsu Canada 24 907 0.5× 1.5k 1.2× 649 0.8× 529 0.7× 309 0.6× 60 3.9k
Leeanne M. Carey Australia 43 1.6k 0.9× 1.9k 1.5× 2.8k 3.5× 360 0.5× 111 0.2× 170 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Cockburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Cockburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Cockburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Cockburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Cockburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Cockburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Cockburn. The network helps show where Janet Cockburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Cockburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Cockburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Cockburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Cockburn. Janet Cockburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ferreira, Giovanni E, John J. Downes, Janet Cockburn, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of education for people with shoulder pain: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 75. 103246–103246. 1 indexed citations
2.
Collett, Johnny, Melanie K. Fleming, Emad Al-Yahya, et al.. (2021). Dual-task walking and automaticity after Stroke: Insights from a secondary analysis and imaging sub-study of a randomised controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 35(11). 1599–1610. 16 indexed citations
3.
Al-Yahya, Emad, Andrea Dennis, Johnny Collett, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of a walking training with simultaneous cognitive demand (dual‐task) in chronic stroke. European Journal of Neurology. 26(3). 435–441. 32 indexed citations
4.
Dennis, Andrea, Rose Bosnell, Helen Dawes, et al.. (2011). Cognitive Context Determines Dorsal Premotor Cortical Activity During Hand Movement in Patients After Stroke. Stroke. 42(4). 1056–1061. 23 indexed citations
5.
Al-Yahya, Emad, Helen Dawes, L. A. Smith, et al.. (2010). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 35(3). 715–728. 820 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Dennis, Andrea, Helen Dawes, Johnny Collett, et al.. (2009). Fast walking under cognitive-motor interference conditions in chronic stroke. Brain Research. 1287. 104–110. 52 indexed citations
7.
Cock, Josephine, et al.. (2003). Who knows best? Awareness of divided attention difficulty in a neurological rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury. 17(7). 561–574. 11 indexed citations
8.
Clare, Linda, et al.. (1999). The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Extended Version. UCL Discovery (University College London). 79 indexed citations
9.
Cockburn, Janet. (1996). Failure of Prospective Memory after Acquired Brain Damage: Preliminary Investigation and Suggestions for Future Directions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 18(2). 304–309. 35 indexed citations
10.
Cockburn, Janet. (1996). Behavioural assessment of memory in normal old age. European Psychiatry. 11. 205s–205s. 2 indexed citations
11.
Halligan, Peter W. & Janet Cockburn. (1994). Research digest. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 4(1). 75–84. 1 indexed citations
12.
Halligan, Peter W., Janet Cockburn, & Barbara A. Wilson. (1991). The behavioural assessment of visual neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1(1). 5–32. 266 indexed citations
13.
Cockburn, Janet, et al.. (1991). The Relative Influence of Intelligence and Age on Everyday Memory. Journal of Gerontology. 46(1). P31–P36. 77 indexed citations
14.
Cockburn, Janet, et al.. (1990). Assessing everyday memory in patients with dysphasia*. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 29(4). 353–360. 9 indexed citations
15.
Wilson, Barbara A., Alan Baddeley, & Janet Cockburn. (1989). How Do Old Dogs Learn New Tricks: Teaching a Technological Skill to Brain Injured People. Cortex. 25(1). 115–119. 23 indexed citations
16.
Wilson, Barbara A., et al.. (1989). The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. 11(6). 855–870. 420 indexed citations
17.
Lincoln, NB, et al.. (1986). Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Occupational Therapy In Health Care. 3(3). 209–210. 42 indexed citations
18.
Ounsted, Margaret, Janet Cockburn, & V.A. Moar. (1985). Hand Preference. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 6(2). 76???80–76???80. 10 indexed citations
19.
Ounsted, Margaret, V.A. Moar, Janet Cockburn, & C.W.G. Redman. (1984). Factors associated with the intellectual ability of children born to women with high risk pregnancies.. BMJ. 288(6423). 1038–1041. 40 indexed citations
20.
Cockburn, Janet, Margaret Ounsted, V.A. Moar, & Christopher W.G. Redman. (1982). FINAL REPORT OF STUDY ON HYPERTENSION DURING PREGNANCY: THE EFFECTS OF SPECIFIC TREATMENT ON THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHILDREN. The Lancet. 319(8273). 647–649. 180 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026