Philip T. Rodgers
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline E. McLaughlinAnn C ScatesMary T. RothMartha AdamsWendy C. CoxRobert A. BlouinRussell J. MumperCharlene R. Williams
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)
- Journals
- Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapyAnnals of PharmacotherapyAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip T. Rodgers
30 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 153
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 150
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 133
- General Health Professions 92
- Molecular Biology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Rodgers
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Rodgers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Rodgers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Rodgers. The network helps show where Philip T. Rodgers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Rodgers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Rodgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Rodgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Rodgers. Philip T. Rodgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 53 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Philip T. Rodgers
Philip T. Rodgers is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Research and Theory and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (153 citations), Family Practice (40 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (133 citations). Philip T. Rodgers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline E. McLaughlin, Ann C Scates, Mary T. Roth, Martha Adams, Wendy C. Cox, Robert A. Blouin, Russell J. Mumper, Charlene R. Williams, Julia Khanova and Nicole R. Pinelli. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Annals of Pharmacotherapy and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.