Philip N. Cohen
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Gender Studies top 0.1%
- Demography top 0.2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Matt L. HuffmanLynne M. CasperSuzanne M. BianchiMakiko FuwaLinda J. WaiteMichelle J. HindinChristine A. BachrachElizabeth Thomson
- Topics
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (29 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (20 papers)Work-Family Balance Challenges (19 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAdministrative Science Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Philip N. Cohen
82 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Sociology and Political Science 2.8k
- Gender Studies 2.1k
- Demography 1.1k
- General Health Professions 569
- Economics and Econometrics 550
Countries citing papers authored by Philip N. Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip N. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip N. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip N. Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip N. Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip N. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip N. Cohen. The network helps show where Philip N. Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip N. Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip N. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip N. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip N. Cohen. Philip N. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | London 2012 and the post-Olympics city: a hollow legacy? | 2 |
| 10 | Families Are Changing--And Staying the Same. | 0 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | London's turning : Thames Gateway-prospects and legacy | 5 |
| 19 | New ethnicities, old racisms? | 57 |
| 20 | Marriage, children, and women's employment: what do we know? | 167 |
About Philip N. Cohen
Philip N. Cohen is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Demography and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 87 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (29 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (20 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (2.1k citations), Demography (1.1k citations) and Public Administration (227 citations). Philip N. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Matt L. Huffman, Lynne M. Casper, Suzanne M. Bianchi, Makiko Fuwa, Linda J. Waite, Michelle J. Hindin, Christine A. Bachrach, Elizabeth Thomson, Arland Thornton and David Ashton. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.