Philip M. Ferguson

1.3k total citations
40 papers, 770 citations indexed

About

Philip M. Ferguson is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip M. Ferguson has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 770 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Education, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 13 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Philip M. Ferguson's work include Disability Rights and Representation (11 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Philip M. Ferguson is often cited by papers focused on Disability Rights and Representation (11 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Philip M. Ferguson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Philip M. Ferguson's co-authors include Dianne L. Ferguson, Steven J. Taylor, David Jones, Susan Peters, Christopher Johnstone, Gerald N. Grob, Alan Gartner, Dorothy Kerzner Lipsky, Scot Danforth and Adrienne Asch and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Educational Research, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education and Journal of American History.

In The Last Decade

Philip M. Ferguson

37 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip M. Ferguson United States	14	341	341	337	197	70	40	770
Dianne L. Ferguson United States	15	608 1.8×	292 0.9×	383 1.1×	202 1.0×	150 2.1×	48	1.0k
Andrea G. Zetlin United States	18	311 0.9×	574 1.7×	431 1.3×	177 0.9×	92 1.3×	61	927
Maya Kalyanpur United States	16	613 1.8×	557 1.6×	274 0.8×	190 1.0×	117 1.7×	27	990
Jill Waterman United States	15	250 0.7×	650 1.9×	268 0.8×	179 0.9×	56 0.8×	41	935
Simo Vehmas Finland	15	188 0.6×	165 0.5×	255 0.8×	151 0.8×	51 0.7×	36	615
Keunho Keefe United States	4	475 1.4×	509 1.5×	172 0.5×	174 0.9×	72 1.0×	5	994
Lorella Terzi United Kingdom	8	212 0.6×	130 0.4×	246 0.7×	226 1.1×	62 0.9×	14	648
Thomas Hehir United States	8	356 1.0×	160 0.5×	243 0.7×	129 0.7×	69 1.0×	21	589
Solveig Magnus Reindal Norway	10	211 0.6×	123 0.4×	211 0.6×	173 0.9×	64 0.9×	14	542
Jennifer Clegg United Kingdom	17	159 0.5×	386 1.1×	190 0.6×	111 0.6×	46 0.7×	51	669

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Ferguson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Ferguson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Ferguson. The network helps show where Philip M. Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Ferguson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Ferguson. Philip M. Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ferguson, Philip M.. (2019). The Future of “Disability:” The Evolution of the Concept and the Experience. Focus on Exceptional Children. 46(1). 1–13. 1 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M. & Janet Sauer. (2013). Introduction: Writing the Global Family, International Perspectives on Disability Studies and Family Narratives. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 9. 2 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M.. (2008). The Doubting Dance: Contributions to a History of Parent/Professional Interactions in Early 20th Century America. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 33(1-2). 48–58. 10 indexed citations

Danforth, Scot, et al.. (2005). Place, Profession, and Program in the History of Special Education Curriculum. 15–40. 14 indexed citations

Peters, Susan, Christopher Johnstone, & Philip M. Ferguson. (2005). A Disability Rights in Education Modelfor evaluating inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 9(2). 139–160. 43 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M.. (2003). The making of the White New Zealand policy: Nationalism, citizenship and the exclusion of the Chinese, 1880-1920. University of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury). 2 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M.. (2002). A Place in the Family. The Journal of Special Education. 36(3). 124–131. 130 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M., et al.. (2000). Slidin' into home: Supporting self-determination through personal support agents and service brokerage strategies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 15(2-3). 111–119. 4 indexed citations

Ferguson, Philip M., et al.. (1999). On Transition Services for Youth with Disabilities. On Point...Brief Discussions of Critical Issues in Urban Education.. 1 indexed citations

10.

Ferguson, Philip M. & Jane Squires. (1998). Strengthening the Linkages between Schools and Families of Children with Disabilities.. 41(4). 1 indexed citations

11.

Ferguson, Philip M. & Dianne L. Ferguson. (1998). The Future of Inclusive Educational Practice: Constructive Tension and the Potential for Reflective Reform. Childhood Education. 74(5). 302–308. 8 indexed citations

12.

Ferguson, Dianne L. & Philip M. Ferguson. (1997). Debating Inclusion in Synecdoche, New York: A Response to Gresham and MacMillan. Review of Educational Research. 67(4). 416–420. 2 indexed citations

13.

Ferguson, Philip M.. (1996). Science and Primary/Secondary Transition. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations

14.

Ferguson, Philip M. & Dianne L. Ferguson. (1996). Communicating Adulthood. Topics in Language Disorders. 16(3). 52–67. 11 indexed citations

15.

Grob, Gerald N. & Philip M. Ferguson. (1995). Abandoned to Their Fate: Social Policy and Practice toward Severely Retarded People in America, 1820-1920. History of Education Quarterly. 35(3). 332–332. 19 indexed citations

16.

Weisner, Thomas S., Ronald Gallimore, Dianne L. Ferguson, et al.. (1994). Family in focus : new perspectives on early childhood special education. Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä). 17 indexed citations

17.

Ferguson, Philip M., Dianne L. Ferguson, & Steven J. Taylor. (1992). Interpreting disability : a qualitative reader. Teachers College Press eBooks. 145 indexed citations

18.

Ferguson, Philip M.. (1988). Abandoned to their fate: A history of social policy and practice toward severely retarded people in America, 1820-1920. 2 indexed citations

19.

Ferguson, Philip M.. (1987). The Social Construction of Mental Retardation.. 18(1). 36 indexed citations

20.

Ferguson, Dianne L., et al.. (1987). G▪U▪I▪D▪E▪S Aid Transition for Severely Handicapped Students. Teaching Exceptional Children. 20(1). 14–18. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact