Philip B. Smith
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Andrew D. PattersonDavid R. PedersonGary H. PerdewRobert G. NicholsLimin ZhangIain A. MurrayImhoi KooFrank J. Gonzalez
- Journals
- Journal of Proteome Research (5 papers)Gut Microbes (3 papers)Analytical Chemistry (3 papers)Toxicological Sciences (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Philip B. Smith
89 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Biological Psychiatry 140
- Behavioral Neuroscience 97
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Spectroscopy 339
- Toxicology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Philip B. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip B. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip B. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip B. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip B. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip B. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip B. Smith. The network helps show where Philip B. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip B. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 174 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 107 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 100 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 142 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 15 | A Comprehensive Profile of Health Risk Behaviors Among Students at a Small Canadian University. | 2009 | 6 |
| 16 | 90-Day Oral Gavage Toxicity Study of C9-C16 Aromatic Fraction Jet-A in Female Sprague-Dawley CD Rats and Male C57BL/6 Mice | 1999 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 26 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 28 |
About Philip B. Smith
Philip B. Smith is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Horticulture, Radiation, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (18 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (15 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (10 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (140 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (97 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Spectroscopy (339 citations) and Toxicology (68 citations). Philip B. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Patterson, David R. Pederson, Gary H. Perdew, Robert G. Nichols, Limin Zhang, Iain A. Murray, Imhoi Koo, Frank J. Gonzalez, A. Peter Snyder and Jingwei Cai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Proteome Research, Gut Microbes, Analytical Chemistry, Toxicological Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.