Clinica Chimica Acta

21.3k papers and 487.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 21.3k papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta in the last decades have received a total of 487.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta usually cover Molecular Biology (6.9k papers), Physiology (3.0k papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (3.0k papers) specifically the topics of Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1.6k papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (860 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (805 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinica Chimica Acta are László Góth, Basil T. Doumas, Homer G. Biggs, Mario Plebani, Margaret J. Fletcher, Giuseppe Lippi, Helge Erik Solberg, W. G. Duncombe, Karlheinz Stalder and Hermann Stegemann.

In The Last Decade

Clinica Chimica Acta

20.1k papers receiving 425.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta.

Countries where authors publish in Clinica Chimica Acta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinica Chimica Acta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinica Chimica Acta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinica Chimica Acta more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026