Péter Sasvári

63 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Péter Sasvári
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Geography, Planning and Development 51
  • Information Systems and Management 26
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 45
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 25
  • Computer Science Applications 18
Replace Rebecca Walker with:
Rebecca Walker Australia
Taehun Lee United States
Beryl Lieff Benderly United States
Carmen Ximénez Spain
Melisa Duque Australia
Fred Cline United States
Maurice J. Eash United States
Gary Klein United States
Nancy E. Barr United States
Andrea Kottmann Netherlands
Péter Sasvári relative to Rebecca Walker Australia Rebecca Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Rebecca Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Sasvári

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Sasvári's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Sasvári with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Sasvári more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Sasvári

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Sasvári. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Sasvári. The network helps show where Péter Sasvári may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Sasvári, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Sasvári Line = papers co-authored together Péter Sasvári links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201744
2 201938
3 201630
4 201825
5 201618
6 202013
7 201813
8 201912
9 202111
10 202210
11 20179
12 20156
13 20186
14 20195
15 20185
16 20215
17 20124
18 20204
19 20214
20 20123

About Péter Sasvári

Péter Sasvári is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Management and General Social Sciences, having authored 85 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (39 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (16 papers), Information Society and Technology Trends (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (3 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), E-Government and Public Services (3 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (51 citations), Information Systems and Management (26 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (45 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (25 citations) and Computer Science Applications (18 citations). Péter Sasvári has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, France and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Lukács, László Barkai, Gyula Bakacsi, Imre Dobos, Joël Ladner, Gábor Michalkó, Małgorzata Wasilewska, Marie‐Pierre Tavolacci, József Poór and Massimo Ciambotti. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Public Health, Heliyon, Journal of Informetrics, Government Information Quarterly and Energies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact