Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments
2016573 citationsDavid Bakker, Nikolaos Kazantzis et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nikolaos Kazantzis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolaos Kazantzis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolaos Kazantzis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolaos Kazantzis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolaos Kazantzis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolaos Kazantzis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolaos Kazantzis. The network helps show where Nikolaos Kazantzis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nikolaos Kazantzis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nikolaos Kazantzis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nikolaos Kazantzis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nikolaos Kazantzis. Nikolaos Kazantzis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos, et al.. (2010). Professional development perceptions and activities of psychiatrists and mental health nurses in New Zealand.. PubMed. 123(1317). 24–34.5 indexed citations
12.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos, Mark A. Reinecke, & Arthur Freeman. (2009). Cognitive and behavioral theories in clinical practice.76 indexed citations
13.
Merrick, Paul L., et al.. (2008). Training Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Practitioners in New Zealand: From University to Clinical Practice. New Zealand journal of psychology. 37(2). 8–17.8 indexed citations
Kazantzis, Nikolaos & Frank M. Dattilio. (2007). Beyond basics: Using homework in cognitive behavior therapy with challenging patients. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 249–251.1 indexed citations
16.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos. (2006). Theory, Research, and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Introduction to the Special Feature. New Zealand journal of psychology. 35(3). 114–116.1 indexed citations
17.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos, et al.. (2005). In pursuit of homework adherence in behavior and cognitive behavior therapy: Comment on Malouff and Schutte (2004). Behavior Therapy. 28(8). 179–183.4 indexed citations
18.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos, Ross Flett, Nigel Long, Carol MacDonald, & Michelle Millar. (2000). Domestic violence, psychological distress, and physical illness among New Zealand women: Results from a community-based study. New Zealand journal of psychology. 29(2). 67–73.14 indexed citations
19.
Flett, Ross, et al.. (1999). Health care needs for older Maori: A study of Kaumatua and Kuia. 13. 136–153.7 indexed citations
20.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos. (1997). Lie and Lyapunov methods in the analysis and synthesis of nonlinear process control systems.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.