Geòrgie Paulik
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Co-authors
- Johanna C. BadcockMurray T. MayberyArnoud ArntzCraig SteelMark HaywardAnna‐Marie JonesPeter M. McEvoyHelen J. Stain
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Geòrgie Paulik
35 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Psychiatry and Mental health 378
- Clinical Psychology 215
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
- Cognitive Neuroscience 186
- Philosophy 101
Countries citing papers authored by Geòrgie Paulik
This map shows the geographic impact of Geòrgie Paulik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geòrgie Paulik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geòrgie Paulik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geòrgie Paulik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geòrgie Paulik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geòrgie Paulik. The network helps show where Geòrgie Paulik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geòrgie Paulik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geòrgie Paulik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geòrgie Paulik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geòrgie Paulik. Geòrgie Paulik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Geòrgie Paulik
Geòrgie Paulik is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (378 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations) and Clinical Psychology (215 citations). Geòrgie Paulik has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Johanna C. Badcock, Murray T. Maybery, Arnoud Arntz, Craig Steel, Mark Hayward, Anna‐Marie Jones, Peter M. McEvoy, Helen J. Stain, Robyn Langdon and Gavin Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.