Peter Goss

419 total citations
15 papers, 192 citations indexed

About

Peter Goss is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Goss has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 192 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Goss's work include Education Systems and Policy (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers). Peter Goss is often cited by papers focused on Education Systems and Policy (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers). Peter Goss collaborates with scholars based in . Peter Goss's co-authors include Debra L. Worthington, Joseph M. Price, Andrew Norton and Stephen Duckett and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law and California Law Review.

In The Last Decade

Peter Goss

14 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Goss	6	124	30	25	25	13	15	192
Matseliso L. Mokhele South Africa	9	194 1.6×	39 1.3×	17 0.7×	30 1.2×	11 0.8×	30	243
Robin Averill New Zealand	9	254 2.0×	34 1.1×	14 0.6×	32 1.3×	9 0.7×	43	310
Gail L. Thompson United States	7	146 1.2×	21 0.7×	23 0.9×	26 1.0×	5 0.4×	23	182
Anna Kilderry Australia	10	198 1.6×	32 1.1×	20 0.8×	87 3.5×	11 0.8×	25	247
Clive McGee New Zealand	8	173 1.4×	32 1.1×	14 0.6×	30 1.2×	8 0.6×	25	230
Trevor Thomas Stewart United States	7	185 1.5×	60 2.0×	13 0.5×	57 2.3×	7 0.5×	19	251
Launcelot Brown United States	7	147 1.2×	20 0.7×	26 1.0×	33 1.3×	25 1.9×	23	213
Felicity McArdle Australia	10	211 1.7×	24 0.8×	26 1.0×	89 3.6×	7 0.5×	31	275
Kristina Zeiser United States	9	161 1.3×	21 0.7×	14 0.6×	26 1.0×	7 0.5×	17	203
Scott Imig United States	10	162 1.3×	25 0.8×	11 0.4×	29 1.2×	15 1.2×	22	221

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goss. The network helps show where Peter Goss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Goss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Goss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Goss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Goss. Peter Goss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2020). COVID catch-up: helping disadvantaged students close the equity gap. 26 indexed citations

2.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2020). Top teachers: sharing expertise to improve teaching. 2 indexed citations

3.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2019). Attracting high achievers to teaching. 4 indexed citations

4.

Duckett, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Commonwealth Orange Book 2019: policy priorities for the federal government. 4 indexed citations

5.

Duckett, Stephen, et al.. (2018). State Orange Book 2018: policy priorities for states and territories. 4 indexed citations

6.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2018). Measuring student progress: a state-by-state report card. 7 indexed citations

7.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2018). The Commonwealth’s role in improving schools.

8.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2017). Engaging students: creating classrooms that improve learning. 54 indexed citations

9.

Goss, Peter. (2017). Towards an adaptive education system in Australia. 4 indexed citations

10.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2016). Widening gaps: what NAPLAN tells us about student progress. 42 indexed citations

11.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2016). Circuit breaker: a new compact on school funding. 1 indexed citations

12.

Goss, Peter, et al.. (2015). Targeted teaching: how better use of data can improve student learning. 30 indexed citations

13.

Worthington, Debra L., et al.. (2002). Hindsight bias, Daubert, and the silicone breast implant litigation: Making the case for court-appointed experts in complex medical and scientific litigation.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 8(2). 154–179. 4 indexed citations

14.

Worthington, Debra L., et al.. (2002). Hindsight bias, Daubert, and the silicone breast implant litigation: Making the case for court-appointed experts in complex medical and scientific litigation.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 8(2). 154–179. 2 indexed citations

15.

Goss, Peter. (1996). Guiding the Hand That Feeds: Toward Socially Optimal Appropriability in Agricultural Biotechnology Innovation. California Law Review. 84(5). 1395–1395. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact