Peter Eirew
Impact in
- Oncology top 1%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 11
- Oncology 20
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 16
- Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Connie J. Eaves (16 shared papers)Julia Stingl (6 shared papers)François Vaillant (2 shared papers)Mark Shackleton (1 shared paper)David Choi (1 shared paper)Haiyan I. Li (1 shared paper)Samuel Aparício (9 shared papers)Afshin Raouf (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Research (3 papers)Breast Cancer Research (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Nature Methods (1 paper)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Eirew
26 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Oncology 1.7k
- Cancer Research 681
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Genetics 162
- Genetics 372
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Eirew
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Eirew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Eirew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Eirew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Eirew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Eirew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Eirew. The network helps show where Peter Eirew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Eirew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1213 |
| 2 | 2008 | 249 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 225 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 130 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 97 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 10 |
About Peter Eirew
Peter Eirew is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Genetics, Dermatology and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (16 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (11 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.7k citations), Cancer Research (681 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations), Genetics (162 citations) and Genetics (372 citations). Peter Eirew has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Connie J. Eaves, Julia Stingl, François Vaillant, Mark Shackleton, David Choi, Haiyan I. Li, Samuel Aparício, Afshin Raouf, Joanne T. Emerman and Gulisa Turashvili. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Breast Cancer Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Nature Methods and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.