Michael Prater

834 total citations
8 papers, 544 citations indexed

About

Michael Prater is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Prater has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 544 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Michael Prater's work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). Michael Prater is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). Michael Prater collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Michael Prater's co-authors include Julia Stingl, Mona Shehata, Christine J. Watson, I. Alasdair Russell, Peter Eirew, Carlos Caldas, Stefanie Avril, Andrew E. Teschendorff, Valérie Petit and Rajshekhar R. Giraddi and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Cell Biology, Cancer Research and PLoS Biology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Prater

8 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Prater United Kingdom	6	413	311	130	84	75	8	544
Anurag N. Paranjape United States	8	273 0.7×	349 1.1×	145 1.1×	99 1.2×	34 0.5×	16	503
Jenny A. Rudnick United States	8	387 0.9×	322 1.0×	155 1.2×	48 0.6×	93 1.2×	9	619
Jessica R. Adams Canada	8	202 0.5×	327 1.1×	118 0.9×	47 0.6×	51 0.7×	11	450
Kurtis Yearsley United States	10	270 0.7×	289 0.9×	129 1.0×	56 0.7×	60 0.8×	13	500
Marni B. Siegel United States	11	160 0.4×	182 0.6×	156 1.2×	76 0.9×	61 0.8×	16	410
Dejan Maglic United States	13	328 0.8×	387 1.2×	141 1.1×	62 0.7×	51 0.7×	14	640
Bianca D. Capaldo Australia	7	308 0.7×	344 1.1×	176 1.4×	74 0.9×	34 0.5×	9	577
Shannon L. Gibson United States	7	238 0.6×	426 1.4×	194 1.5×	43 0.5×	51 0.7×	8	548
Diana Hubbard United States	3	170 0.4×	328 1.1×	123 0.9×	105 1.3×	35 0.5×	6	457
Nikiana Simigdala United Kingdom	11	134 0.3×	234 0.8×	136 1.0×	137 1.6×	81 1.1×	17	455

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Prater

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Prater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Prater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Prater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Prater

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Prater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Prater. The network helps show where Michael Prater may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Prater

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Prater. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Prater based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Prater. Michael Prater is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Cheikh, Bassem Ben, Aditya Pratapa, Anand Bhaskar, et al.. (2022). Abstract 3877: Deep ultrahigh-plex spatial phenotyping of human cancer tissues. Cancer Research. 82(12_Supplement). 3877–3877. 5 indexed citations

2.

Prater, Michael, et al.. (2021). The State of IoT Security: Unequivocal Appeal to Cybercriminals, Onerous to Defenders. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 11(3). 59–68. 13 indexed citations

3.

Prater, Michael, Valérie Petit, I. Alasdair Russell, et al.. (2014). Mammary stem cells have myoepithelial cell properties. Nature Cell Biology. 16(10). 942–950. 172 indexed citations

4.

Makarem, Maisam, Nagarajan Kannan, Long Nguyen, et al.. (2013). Developmental Changes in the in Vitro Activated Regenerative Activity of Primitive Mammary Epithelial Cells. PLoS Biology. 11(8). e1001630–e1001630. 46 indexed citations

5.

Prater, Michael, Mona Shehata, Christine J. Watson, & Julia Stingl. (2012). Enzymatic Dissociation, Flow Cytometric Analysis, and Culture of Normal Mouse Mammary Tissue. Methods in molecular biology. 946. 395–409. 30 indexed citations

6.

Smalley, Matthew J., Howard Kendrick, Julie M. Sheridan, et al.. (2012). Isolation of Mouse Mammary Epithelial Subpopulations: A Comparison of Leading Methods. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 17(2). 91–97. 50 indexed citations

7.

Shehata, Mona, Andrew E. Teschendorff, I. Alasdair Russell, et al.. (2012). Phenotypic and functional characterisation of the luminal cell hierarchy of the mammary gland. Breast Cancer Research. 14(5). R134–R134. 225 indexed citations

8.

Prater, Michael. (2002). Art Criticism: Modifying the Formalist Approach. Art Education. 55(5). 12–12. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact