David Choi

8.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
143 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

David Choi is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, David Choi has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 90 papers in Surgery, 51 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 33 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in David Choi's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (41 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (31 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (28 papers). David Choi is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (41 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (31 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (28 papers). David Choi collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. David Choi's co-authors include Mark Shackleton, Peter Eirew, Haiyan I. Li, Julia Stingl, Connie J. Eaves, François Vaillant, Geoffrey Raisman, Michael G. Fehlings, James S. Harrop and Brian K. Kwon and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

David Choi

137 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial ... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2017 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Choi United Kingdom 32 1.9k 1.5k 1.1k 1.0k 766 143 4.9k
Hideaki E. Takahashi Japan 31 1.4k 0.7× 710 0.5× 739 0.7× 612 0.6× 196 0.3× 145 3.5k
Matthias Priemel Germany 30 691 0.4× 1.1k 0.7× 2.1k 1.9× 1.1k 1.0× 255 0.3× 76 5.6k
Friedrich E. Kruse Germany 64 685 0.4× 438 0.3× 2.2k 2.1× 998 1.0× 258 0.3× 351 14.1k
Tomoatsu Kimura Japan 50 3.3k 1.8× 3.0k 2.0× 1.8k 1.6× 524 0.5× 123 0.2× 212 7.7k
Michel Péoc’h France 35 1.1k 0.6× 558 0.4× 982 0.9× 959 0.9× 147 0.2× 285 5.3k
Yawara Eguchi Japan 37 1.8k 1.0× 1.8k 1.2× 1.5k 1.4× 287 0.3× 310 0.4× 219 5.5k
Ken Ishii Japan 39 3.2k 1.7× 2.6k 1.7× 600 0.6× 153 0.2× 788 1.0× 225 5.6k
Natsuo Yasui Japan 40 2.0k 1.1× 1.1k 0.8× 1.8k 1.7× 547 0.5× 123 0.2× 189 5.5k
Anna Petryk United States 36 555 0.3× 955 0.6× 2.4k 2.2× 467 0.5× 1.0k 1.3× 126 6.0k
Shiro Ikegawa Japan 55 2.1k 1.1× 1.2k 0.8× 5.3k 4.9× 1.2k 1.2× 269 0.4× 306 11.8k

Countries citing papers authored by David Choi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Choi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Choi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Choi. The network helps show where David Choi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Choi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Choi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Choi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Choi. David Choi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Donnell, Paul, Dorothee Harder, Wendy Brown, et al.. (2025). The TBXT rs2305089 SNP links the benign notochordal cell tumour and chordoma. The Journal of Pathology. 266(3). 247–257.
3.
Pendolino, Alfonso Luca, et al.. (2022). Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and quality of life in hospitalised patients 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 12(1). e054598–e054598. 21 indexed citations
4.
Vakharia, Vejay N., et al.. (2021). Printing in a Pandemic: 3D printing solutions for healthcare during COVID-19. A Protocol for a PRISMA systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100015–100015. 11 indexed citations
5.
Flanagan, Adrienne M., et al.. (2019). Systematic Review of Clinical, Radiologic, and Histologic Features of Benign Notochordal Cell Tumors: Implications for Patient Management. World Neurosurgery. 130. 13–23. 9 indexed citations
6.
Choi, David, et al.. (2019). Cervical spinal arteriovenous fistula with ventral perimedullary venous drainage. Acta Neurochirurgica. 162(4). 961–965.
7.
Tol, Floris R. van, David Choi, Helena M. Verkooijen, F. Cumhur Öner, & Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan. (2019). Delayed presentation to a spine surgeon is the strongest predictor of poor postoperative outcome in patients surgically treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. The Spine Journal. 19(9). 1540–1547. 23 indexed citations
9.
Andrews, Peter, Anne‐Lise Poirrier, Valerie J. Lund, & David Choi. (2016). Safety of human olfactory mucosal biopsy for the purpose of olfactory ensheathing cell harvest and nerve repair: a prospective controlled study in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Rhinology Journal. 54(2). 183–191. 18 indexed citations
10.
Choi, David, et al.. (2016). Proton beam therapy in the management of skull base chordomas: systematic review of indications, outcomes, and implications for neurosurgeons. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 30(4). 382–387. 20 indexed citations
11.
Borg, Anouk, Matthew A. Kirkman, & David Choi. (2016). Endoscopic Endonasal Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review of Complications During the Past 65 Years. World Neurosurgery. 95. 383–391. 63 indexed citations
12.
Morris, Stephen, et al.. (2015). Cost of Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases in the United Kingdom. World Neurosurgery. 84(5). 1235–1243. 18 indexed citations
13.
Telfeian, Albert E., et al.. (2015). Transforaminal endoscopic surgery under local analgesia for ventral epidural thoracic spinal tumor: Case report. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 134. 1–3. 34 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Miao, Cody Bünger, Haisheng Li, et al.. (2015). Improved patient selection by stratified surgical intervention: Aarhus Spinal Metastases Algorithm. The Spine Journal. 15(7). 1554–1562. 5 indexed citations
15.
Choi, David, et al.. (2013). Olfactory Ensheathing Cells: Part I—Current Concepts and Experimental Laboratory Models. World Neurosurgery. 83(1). 114–119. 9 indexed citations
16.
Choi, David, et al.. (2013). Olfactory Ensheathing Cells: Part II—Source of Cells and Application to Patients. World Neurosurgery. 83(2). 251–256. 9 indexed citations
17.
Chaudhuri, Abhijit, et al.. (2011). Swelling and enhancement of the cervical spinal cord: when is a tumour not a tumour?. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 26(4). 450–455. 6 indexed citations
18.
Choi, David & Michael Gleeson. (2010). Surgery for Chordomas of the Craniocervical Junction: Lessons Learned. Skull base. 20(1). 41–45. 17 indexed citations
19.
Singh, Anoushka, David Choi, & Alan Crockard. (2009). Use of Walking Data in Assessing Operative Results for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Spine. 34(12). 1296–1300. 18 indexed citations
20.
Hill, Ciaran Scott, et al.. (2008). A rare case of vomiting: fourth ventricular B-cell lymphoma. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 93(2). 261–262. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026