Peter Degoey

2.4k citations
6 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Degoey

6 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. 1996 · 651 citations
6511996202620062016200400600

Peers

Peter Degoey
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 525
  • Social Psychology 427
  • Safety Research 167
  • Sociology and Political Science 864
  • Gender Studies 171
Replace Steve Hinkle with:
Steve Hinkle United States
M. Hamit Fişek Türkiye
Deborah M. Kolb United States
Shirli Kopelman United States
Martin Patchen United States
Paul G. Schervish United States
Carolyn Wiethoff United States
Caryn J. Block United States
Christopher W. Bauman United States
Andrew Li United States
Peter Degoey relative to Steve Hinkle United States Steve Hinkle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Steve Hinkle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Degoey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Degoey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Degoey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Degoey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Degoey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Degoey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Degoey. The network helps show where Peter Degoey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Peter Degoey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Degoey Line = papers co-authored together Peter Degoey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2000133
2
Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model.
Hit paper breakdown →
1996651
3 199642
4
Community, family, and the social good: the psychological dynamics of procedural justice and social identification.
199515
5 1995314
6 1995335

About Peter Degoey

Peter Degoey is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper), Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper) and Social Power and Status Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (525 citations), Social Psychology (427 citations), Safety Research (167 citations), Sociology and Political Science (864 citations) and Gender Studies (171 citations). Peter Degoey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom R. Tyler and Heather J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Research in Organizational Behavior and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026