Peter Branney

47 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Peter Branney
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Gender Studies 66
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 45
  • General Health Professions 153
  • Pharmacy 25
  • General Psychology 6
Replace Frank Houghton with:
Frank Houghton Ireland
Laura E. Hirshfield United States
Lynn Jones United States
Bonnie Bullough United States
Susan Marks United Kingdom
Mark Barrow New Zealand
Theresa Montini United States
Shelagh K. Genuis Canada
Frans J. Meijman Netherlands
Louise Bryant United Kingdom
Peter Branney relative to Frank Houghton Ireland Frank Houghton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Frank Houghton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Branney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Branney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Branney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Branney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Branney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Branney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Branney. The network helps show where Peter Branney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Branney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Branney Line = papers co-authored together Peter Branney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200876
2 201339
3
The Gender and Access to Health Services Study: Final Report
200832
4
People in Public Health - a study of approaches to develop and support people in public health roles
201029
5 201426
6 201924
7 201321
8 201919
9 201316
10 200916
11 200816
12 202315
13 201114
14 201213
15 201312
16 201411
17 202211
18 201111
19 20188
20 20088

About Peter Branney

Peter Branney is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (10 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (5 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (66 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (45 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations) and General Psychology (6 citations). Peter Branney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Alan White, Jane South, Ian Eardley, Karina Kinsella, Angela Meah, Sarah Payne, David Wilkins, Julie Evans, Anne‐Marie Bagnall and Judy White. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion International, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Evaluation and Program Planning and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact