Qualitative Research in Psychology

575 papers and 114.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 575 papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 114.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (284 papers), Social Psychology (138 papers) and General Health Professions (121 papers) specifically the topics of Participatory Visual Research Methods (120 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (108 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Research in Psychology are Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, Oliver Robinson, Jonathan A. Smith, Simon Watts, Michael Larkin, Paul Stenner, Rachel Shaw, David R. Thomas and Nigel King.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Research in Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Research in Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Research in Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Research in Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025