Sarah Payne

1.2k citations
37 papers · 624 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers)Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers)Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Sarah Payne

34 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Sarah Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Clinical Psychology 148
  • Toxicology 136
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Gender Studies 96
  • Sociology and Political Science 94
Replace Patricia Wilkie with:
Patricia Wilkie United Kingdom
Thủy Nguyễn United States
Daniel M. Cook United States
Lawrence S. Lewin United States
Alina Cernasev United States
Tana Wuliji United Kingdom
Nília Maria de Brito Lima Prado Brazil
Zelalem Mengesha Australia
David H. Kreling United States
Hannah Hesselgreaves United Kingdom
Sarah Payne relative to Patricia Wilkie United Kingdom Patricia Wilkie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Patricia Wilkie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Payne. The network helps show where Sarah Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Payne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Payne. Sarah Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 10
3 5
4 4
5 6
6 3
7 15
8 19
9 28
10
Social Exclusion and Mental Health - Review of Literature and Existing Surveys
6
11
Masculinities and suicide
20
12 148
13
The Gender and Access to Health Services Study: Final Report
32
14
The ethical, legal and social context of harm reduction.
21
15 7
16
Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey
8
17
Starting Advanced Mathematics: The Essential Foundation
1
18 1
19 36
20 7

About Sarah Payne

Sarah Payne is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Toxicology and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (136 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations) and Gender Studies (96 citations). Sarah Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Viren Swami, Debbi Stanistreet, Steff Lewis, Peter Branney, David Wilkins, Seung Woon Paik, David Gordon, Bernie Pauly, Jane McCall and Ray Forrest. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Medicine, Fuel and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026