John Freccero
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History 3
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
- History top 1%
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 11
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 1
-
- French Literature and Criticism 1
- French Literature and Poetry 1
- General Arts and Humanities top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
-
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 1
- Co-authors
- Rachel JacoffMaría Rosa MenocalErich AuerbachDeborah ParkerMichael O’NeillJasper GriffinDavid LoewensteinGeorge Monteiro
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Freccero
20 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Classics 78
- History 98
- Literature and Literary Theory 67
- General Arts and Humanities 5
- Philosophy 28
Countries citing papers authored by John Freccero
This map shows the geographic impact of John Freccero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Freccero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Freccero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Freccero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Freccero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Freccero. The network helps show where John Freccero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Freccero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 4 | A modern reader's guide to Dante's The divine comedy | 1999 | 0 |
| 5 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 16 | Dante: A Collection of Critical Essays | 1965 | 13 |
| 17 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1959 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 4 |
About John Freccero
John Freccero is a scholar working on Classics, History, General Arts and Humanities, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 26 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (11 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), French Literature and Poetry (1 paper) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (78 citations), History (98 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations), General Arts and Humanities (5 citations) and Philosophy (28 citations). John Freccero has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Jacoff, María Rosa Menocal, Erich Auerbach, Deborah Parker, Michael O’Neill, Jasper Griffin, David Loewenstein, George Monteiro, Claude Rawson and Karl Reichl. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, The Modern Language Review, Harvard Theological Review, diacritics and Poetics Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.