Peter Anto Johnson

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries 2014 · 682 citations
6822014202620182022200400600

Peers

Peter Anto Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 362
  • Applied Psychology 157
  • Social Psychology 464
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 249
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 160
Replace John McCormick with:
John McCormick Australia
Carmen Tabernero Spain
Shelley A. Blozis United States
Jorge L. Mendoza United States
Sriram Kalyanaraman United States
Vicenç Quera Spain
Julien Chanal Switzerland
Ron Friedman United States
Melissa Ferguson United States
Hoi K. Suen United States
Peter Anto Johnson relative to John McCormick Australia John McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
John McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Anto Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Anto Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Anto Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Anto Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Anto Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Anto Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Anto Johnson. The network helps show where Peter Anto Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Anto Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Anto Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Peter Anto Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20221
3 20211
4 20214
5 20212
6 20205
7 20201
8 201927
9 20194
10 20185
11 20153
12 201414
13 2008110
14 20053
15 20007
16 19926
17 198664
18 198059
19 1976198
20 197110

About Peter Anto Johnson

Peter Anto Johnson is a scholar working on Anatomy, Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Virology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (362 citations), Applied Psychology (157 citations), Social Psychology (464 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (249 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (160 citations). Peter Anto Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stuart J. Dimond, Anja H. Olafsen, Patrice Roussel, Marylène Gagné, Zheni Wang, Charles Benabou, Stefan T. Güntert, Anja Van den Broeck, Jacques Forest and Laurence Crevier‐Braud. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Virology, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Journal of General Virology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026