Kenneth M. Stedman
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Ecology top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wolfram ZilligGeoffrey S. DiemerMark YoungDavid PrangishviliSydney KustuHien PhanQunxin SheKarl E. Klose
- Topics
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (37 papers)Plant Virus Research Studies (23 papers)Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (21 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Molecular Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyDenmark
In The Last Decade
Kenneth M. Stedman
51 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Ecology 1.3k
- Plant Science 555
- Genetics 517
- Infectious Diseases 271
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth M. Stedman
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth M. Stedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth M. Stedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth M. Stedman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth M. Stedman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth M. Stedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth M. Stedman. The network helps show where Kenneth M. Stedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth M. Stedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth M. Stedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth M. Stedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth M. Stedman. Kenneth M. Stedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | Preservation Potential of Lipid-Containing Viruses Under Silicifying Conditions | 1 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 188 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 117 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 111 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 59 |
About Kenneth M. Stedman
Kenneth M. Stedman is a scholar working on Ecology, Endocrinology and Plant Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (37 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (23 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (1.3k citations), Endocrinology (146 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.4k citations). Kenneth M. Stedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Wolfram Zillig, Geoffrey S. Diemer, Mark Young, David Prangishvili, Sydney Kustu, Hien Phan, Qunxin She, Karl E. Klose, Anne North and Christa Schleper. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.