Paul M. Sniderman

12.5k total citations · 4 hit papers
88 papers, 7.3k citations indexed

About

Paul M. Sniderman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul M. Sniderman has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 7.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 30 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Paul M. Sniderman's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (25 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Paul M. Sniderman is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (25 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Paul M. Sniderman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Paul M. Sniderman's co-authors include Richard A. Brody, Thomas Piazza, Philip E. Tetlock, Louk Hagendoorn, Phillip E. Tetlock, Markus Prior, Edward G. Carmines, Henry E. Brady, Philip E. Tetlock and Jon Hurwitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Sociology and American Political Science Review.

In The Last Decade

Paul M. Sniderman

83 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Hit Papers

Reasoning and choice expl... 1986 2026 1999 2012 1991 2004 1993 1986 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul M. Sniderman United States 36 5.2k 3.9k 1.1k 993 837 88 7.3k
John R. Hibbing United States 40 3.9k 0.7× 3.3k 0.8× 1.2k 1.0× 759 0.8× 1.2k 1.4× 129 7.1k
Jack Citrin United States 37 4.7k 0.9× 3.4k 0.9× 873 0.8× 516 0.5× 327 0.4× 75 6.3k
Leonie Huddy United States 30 4.2k 0.8× 2.9k 0.7× 1.0k 0.9× 1.8k 1.8× 878 1.0× 65 6.5k
Clem­ Brooks­ United States 28 3.5k 0.7× 3.7k 0.9× 1.6k 1.4× 1.0k 1.1× 283 0.3× 63 6.1k
Jeffery J. Mondak United States 35 3.1k 0.6× 2.7k 0.7× 1.6k 1.4× 654 0.7× 482 0.6× 85 5.4k
Nicholas A. Valentino United States 33 4.7k 0.9× 3.1k 0.8× 2.0k 1.8× 826 0.8× 535 0.6× 67 6.4k
M. Kent Jennings United States 42 4.6k 0.9× 3.9k 1.0× 2.3k 2.0× 1.3k 1.3× 486 0.6× 113 7.5k
Donald R. Kinder United States 37 7.6k 1.5× 5.9k 1.5× 3.0k 2.7× 1.5k 1.5× 1.3k 1.5× 64 12.0k
James L. Gibson United States 54 3.9k 0.8× 3.6k 0.9× 512 0.5× 595 0.6× 563 0.7× 216 8.4k
Anthony Heath United Kingdom 47 4.6k 0.9× 2.6k 0.7× 394 0.4× 775 0.8× 383 0.5× 178 7.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Sniderman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Sniderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Sniderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Sniderman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Sniderman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Sniderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Sniderman. The network helps show where Paul M. Sniderman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Sniderman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Sniderman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Sniderman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Sniderman. Paul M. Sniderman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carmines, Edward G., et al.. (2025). The Political Dynamics of Partisan Polarization. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
2.
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth, Marc Helbling, Paul M. Sniderman, & Richard Traunmüller. (2024). Value Conflicts Revisited: Muslims, Gender Equality, and Gestures of Respect. British Journal of Political Science. 54(3). 836–850. 3 indexed citations
3.
Sniderman, Paul M.. (2023). Experimenting with experiments: a ‘Shandean’ approach. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 159(1). 7–20.
4.
Sniderman, Paul M. & Thomas Piazza. (2021). Black Pride and Black Prejudice. Princeton University Press eBooks.
5.
Sniderman, Paul M.. (2018). Some Advances in the Design of Survey Experiments. Annual Review of Political Science. 21(1). 259–275. 45 indexed citations
6.
Stubager, Rune, Paul M. Sniderman, Michael Bang Petersen, & Rune Slothuus. (2014). Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy. Princeton University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lelkes, Yphtach & Paul M. Sniderman. (2014). The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System. British Journal of Political Science. 46(4). 825–844. 35 indexed citations
8.
Jackman, Simon & Paul M. Sniderman. (2006). The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments. The Journal of Politics. 68(2). 272–283. 50 indexed citations
9.
Sniderman, Paul M., Louk Hagendoorn, & Markus Prior. (2003). De moeizame acceptatie van moslims in Nederland. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 78(3). 18 indexed citations
10.
Hagendoorn, Louk & Paul M. Sniderman. (2001). Experimenting with a national sample: a Dutch survey of prejudice. Patterns of Prejudice. 35(4). 19–31. 30 indexed citations
11.
Lupia, Arthur, Arthur Lupia, Arthur T. Denzau, et al.. (2000). Elements of Reason. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 99 indexed citations
12.
Sniderman, Paul M., W. H. Howell, William F. Morgan, & Edward G. Carmines. (1999). Essai sur différentes interprétations du facteur racial dans le système politique américain aujourd'hui : analyse critique de Divided by Color. Revue française de science politique. Vol. 49(2). 265–294. 1 indexed citations
13.
Hurwitz, Jon, et al.. (1997). Racial Stereotypes and Whites' Political Views of Blacks in the Context of Welfare and Crime. American Journal of Political Science. 41(1). 30–30. 270 indexed citations
14.
Sniderman, Paul M.. (1994). Commentary: Burden of Proof. Political Psychology. 15(3). 541–541. 1 indexed citations
15.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, & Phillip E. Tetlock. (1991). Reasoning and choice explorations in political psychology. 949 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Sniderman, Paul M., Philip E. Tetlock, James M. Glaser, Donald P. Green, & Michael Hout. (1989). Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public. British Journal of Political Science. 19(1). 25–45. 113 indexed citations
17.
Alcalay, Rina, et al.. (1989). Ethnic Differences in Knowledge of AIDS Transmission and Attitudes towards Gays and People with AIDS. International Quarterly of Community Health Education. 10(3). 213–222. 17 indexed citations
18.
Sniderman, Paul M. & Michael G. Hagen. (1985). Race and inequality : a study in American values. 76 indexed citations
19.
Brady, Henry E. & Paul M. Sniderman. (1985). Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning. American Political Science Review. 79(4). 1061–1078. 351 indexed citations
20.
Sniderman, Paul M.. (1978). The Politics of Faith. British Journal of Political Science. 8(1). 21–44. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026