Paul M. Sniderman
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.05%
- Communication top 0.2%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Richard A. BrodyThomas PiazzaPhilip E. TetlockLouk HagendoornPhillip E. TetlockMarkus PriorEdward G. CarminesHenry E. Brady
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (25 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers)Social Media and Politics (7 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Journal of SociologyAmerican Political Science Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Paul M. Sniderman
83 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Sociology and Political Science 5.2k
- Political Science and International Relations 3.9k
- Communication 1.1k
- Gender Studies 993
- Social Psychology 837
Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Sniderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Sniderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Sniderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Sniderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Sniderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Sniderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Sniderman. The network helps show where Paul M. Sniderman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Sniderman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Sniderman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Sniderman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Sniderman. Paul M. Sniderman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | De moeizame acceptatie van moslims in Nederland | 18 |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 99 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 92 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 113 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | Race and inequality : a study in American values | 76 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 164 | |
| 20 | 119 |
About Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 88 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (25 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (3.9k citations), Communication (1.1k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (5.2k citations). Paul M. Sniderman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Brody, Thomas Piazza, Philip E. Tetlock, Louk Hagendoorn, Phillip E. Tetlock, Markus Prior, Edward G. Carmines, Henry E. Brady, Philip E. Tetlock and Jon Hurwitz. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Sociology and American Political Science Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.