Katherine Clayton

1.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
21 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

Katherine Clayton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine Clayton has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Katherine Clayton's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers). Katherine Clayton is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers). Katherine Clayton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Katherine Clayton's co-authors include Brendan Nyhan, Yusaku Horiuchi, Amanda Zhou, Evan Morgan, Jonathan A. Busam, Jonathan W. Martin, John M. Carey, Ethan Porter, Timothy J. Ryan and Nicholas T. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vaccine and Political Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Katherine Clayton

20 papers receiving 679 citations

Hit Papers

Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 2021 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine Clayton United States 8 556 281 204 163 56 21 709
D.J. Flynn United States 7 738 1.3× 328 1.2× 210 1.0× 144 0.9× 33 0.6× 9 865
Nicoleta Corbu Romania 13 500 0.9× 360 1.3× 114 0.6× 117 0.7× 33 0.6× 45 670
Axel Westerwick United States 12 381 0.7× 265 0.9× 60 0.3× 72 0.4× 36 0.6× 19 534
Ana Sofía Cardenal Spain 14 439 0.8× 458 1.6× 117 0.6× 95 0.6× 17 0.3× 26 695
Benjamin Bowyer United States 11 587 1.1× 366 1.3× 177 0.9× 85 0.5× 53 0.9× 14 853
Moreno Mancosu Italy 11 351 0.6× 142 0.5× 111 0.5× 90 0.6× 18 0.3× 42 447
Elina Lindgren Sweden 9 499 0.9× 429 1.5× 54 0.3× 141 0.9× 57 1.0× 23 688
Václav Štětka United Kingdom 17 508 0.9× 577 2.1× 172 0.8× 83 0.5× 10 0.2× 52 877
Nel Ruigrok Netherlands 13 305 0.5× 339 1.2× 61 0.3× 85 0.5× 18 0.3× 28 616
Orestis Papakyriakopoulos United States 12 307 0.6× 193 0.7× 44 0.2× 196 1.2× 59 1.1× 29 490

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Clayton. The network helps show where Katherine Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Clayton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Clayton. Katherine Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clayton, Katherine, Ethan Porter, Yamil Velez, & Thomas Wood. (2024). Improving debriefing practices for participants in social science experiments. PNAS Nexus. 3(12). pgae502–pgae502. 1 indexed citations
2.
Clayton, Katherine & Robb Willer. (2023). Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections. Research & Politics. 10(1). 14 indexed citations
3.
Clayton, Katherine. (2023). Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States. Research & Politics. 10(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Clayton, Katherine, Charles Crabtree, & Yusaku Horiuchi. (2022). Do Identity Frames Impact Support for Multiracial Candidates? The Case of Kamala Harris. Journal of Experimental Political Science. 10(1). 112–123. 7 indexed citations
5.
Clayton, Katherine, et al.. (2022). The BIAT and the AMP as measures of racial prejudice in political science: A methodological assessment. Political Science Research and Methods. 11(2). 363–373. 3 indexed citations
6.
Clayton, Katherine, Jeremy Ferwerda, & Yusaku Horiuchi. (2022). The Stability of Not-In-My-Backyard Attitudes toward Refugees: Evidence from the Ukrainian Refugee Crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
8.
Clayton, Katherine & Robb Willer. (2021). Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
9.
Clayton, Katherine, Nicholas T. Davis, Brendan Nyhan, et al.. (2021). Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(23). 108 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Clayton, Katherine, et al.. (2020). The Validity of the IAT and the AMP as Measures of Racial Prejudice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
11.
Carey, John M., Katherine Clayton, Gretchen Helmke, et al.. (2020). Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 32(1). 230–245. 84 indexed citations
12.
Clayton, Katherine, et al.. (2020). The Identity Issue of the Colonized and the Colonizer in Cloud Nine by Caryl Churchill. 4(1). 1–8. 2 indexed citations
13.
Clayton, Katherine, et al.. (2019). Partisan motivated reasoning and misinformation in the media: Is news from ideologically uncongenial sources more suspicious?. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 20(3). 129–142. 28 indexed citations
14.
Carey, John M., Katherine Clayton, & Yusaku Horiuchi. (2019). Campus Diversity. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
15.
Carey, John M., Katherine Clayton, & Yusaku Horiuchi. (2019). Campus Diversity: The Hidden Consensus.
16.
Clayton, Katherine, Jeremy Ferwerda, & Yusaku Horiuchi. (2019). Exposure to Immigration and Admission Preferences: Evidence from France. Political Behavior. 43(1). 175–200. 45 indexed citations
17.
Clayton, Katherine, Jonathan A. Busam, Jonathan W. Martin, et al.. (2019). Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media. Political Behavior. 42(4). 1073–1095. 367 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Carey, John M., et al.. (2018). Who wants to hire a more diverse faculty? A conjoint analysis of faculty and student preferences for gender and racial/ethnic diversity. Politics Groups and Identities. 8(3). 535–553. 21 indexed citations
20.
Clayton, Katherine, et al.. (2017). Media Source, Selective Exposure, and Susceptibility to False Information. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026