Philip E. Tetlock

26.5k total citations · 7 hit papers
160 papers, 16.1k citations indexed

About

Philip E. Tetlock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip E. Tetlock has authored 160 papers receiving a total of 16.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 70 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 34 papers in Social Psychology and 22 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Philip E. Tetlock's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (51 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (19 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (19 papers). Philip E. Tetlock is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (51 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (19 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (19 papers). Philip E. Tetlock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Philip E. Tetlock's co-authors include Jennifer S. Lerner, Paul M. Sniderman, Richard Boettger, Jae Il Kim, Gregory Mitchell, Linda J. Skitka, Julie H. Goldberg, Carmit T. Tadmor, Antony S. R. Manstead and Alan Page Fiske and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and Academy of Management Review.

In The Last Decade

Philip E. Tetlock

157 papers receiving 14.3k citations

Hit Papers

5 papers align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Accounting for the effects of accountability.

1999 1.5k citations Jennifer S. Lerner, Philip E. Tetlock Psychological Bulletin profile →
Accountability and complexity of thought.

1983 639 citations Philip E. Tetlock Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →
The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

2000 595 citations Philip E. Tetlock, Orie V. Kristel et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →
Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.

2013 485 citations Frederick L. Oswald, Gregory Mitchell et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →
Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.

1985 475 citations Philip E. Tetlock Research in Organizational Behavior profile →
Taboo Trade‐offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice

1997 390 citations Philip E. Tetlock et al. profile →
Symbolic Racism: Problems of Motive Attribution in Political Analysis

1986 318 citations Paul M. Sniderman, Philip E. Tetlock profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip E. Tetlock United States	63	8.2k	4.5k	2.4k	2.2k	1.6k	160	16.1k
Lee Ross United States	53	9.1k 1.1×	5.2k 1.2×	2.8k 1.2×	1.2k 0.6×	2.6k 1.6×	106	19.0k
Ziva Kunda United States	39	8.4k 1.0×	4.9k 1.1×	2.5k 1.1×	1.1k 0.5×	1.5k 0.9×	52	16.1k
Jennifer S. Lerner United States	38	5.9k 0.7×	5.0k 1.1×	3.0k 1.3×	804 0.4×	1.9k 1.2×	74	15.4k
Dale T. Miller United States	53	8.0k 1.0×	5.6k 1.2×	2.8k 1.2×	412 0.2×	1.8k 1.1×	126	17.2k
Reid Hastie United States	53	3.8k 0.5×	2.9k 0.6×	2.2k 0.9×	507 0.2×	2.3k 1.4×	148	12.0k
Marilynn B. Brewer United States	74	17.9k 2.2×	11.7k 2.6×	3.3k 1.4×	1.6k 0.7×	565 0.3×	160	28.0k
Fritz Heider United States	9	8.4k 1.0×	6.9k 1.5×	2.2k 1.0×	524 0.2×	967 0.6×	22	18.9k
Max H. Bazerman United States	74	6.6k 0.8×	2.9k 0.7×	2.4k 1.0×	447 0.2×	3.1k 1.9×	301	19.0k
Jon Elster United States	55	7.8k 1.0×	1.3k 0.3×	1.0k 0.4×	5.4k 2.5×	1.5k 0.9×	231	18.3k
E. Allan Lind United States	41	6.5k 0.8×	3.0k 0.7×	914 0.4×	1.2k 0.6×	395 0.2×	84	12.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Tetlock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Tetlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Tetlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Tetlock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Tetlock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Tetlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Tetlock. The network helps show where Philip E. Tetlock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip E. Tetlock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip E. Tetlock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip E. Tetlock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip E. Tetlock. Philip E. Tetlock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Karger, Ezra, et al.. (2025). Belief updating in AI‐risk debates: Exploring the limits of adversarial collaboration. Risk Analysis. 45(12). 4350–4366.

Schoenegger, Philipp, Peter S. Park, Ezra Karger, Sean Trott, & Philip E. Tetlock. (2024). AI-Augmented Predictions: LLM Assistants Improve Human Forecasting Accuracy. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. 15(1). 1–25. 6 indexed citations

Schoenegger, Philipp, et al.. (2024). Wisdom of the silicon crowd: LLM ensemble prediction capabilities rival human crowd accuracy. Science Advances. 10(45). eadp1528–eadp1528. 13 indexed citations

Mitchell, Gregory & Philip E. Tetlock. (2022). Are Progressives in Denial About Progress? Yes, but So Is Almost Everyone Else. Clinical Psychological Science. 11(4). 683–704. 6 indexed citations

Mellers, Barbara A., Philip E. Tetlock, & Hal R. Arkes. (2018). Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization. Cognition. 188. 19–26. 18 indexed citations

Mellers, Barbara A., et al.. (2017). How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study. Judgment and Decision Making. 12(4). 369–381. 34 indexed citations

Blanton, Hart, et al.. (2015). Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(5). 1468–1481. 45 indexed citations

Oswald, Frederick L., Gregory Mitchell, Hart Blanton, James Jaccard, & Philip E. Tetlock. (2013). Predicting Ethnic and Racial Discrimination: A Meta-Analysis of IAT Criterion Studies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Tetlock, Philip E. & Barbara A. Mellers. (2011). Intelligent management of intelligence agencies: Beyond accountability ping-pong.. American Psychologist. 66(6). 542–554. 52 indexed citations

10.

Blanton, Hart, et al.. (2009). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94(3). 567–582. 13 indexed citations

11.

Suedfeld, Peter & Philip E. Tetlock. (2007). Assessing the sincerity of politicians: the case of President George W. Bush. 69–79. 1 indexed citations

12.

Mitchell, Gregory & Philip E. Tetlock. (2006). Antidiscrimination Law and the Perils of Mindreading. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University). 40 indexed citations

13.

Lupia, Arthur, Arthur T. Denzau, Paul M. Sniderman, et al.. (2000). Elements of Reason. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 99 indexed citations

14.

Tetlock, Philip E., et al.. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78(5). 853–870. 595 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Markman, Keith D. & Philip E. Tetlock. (2000). ‘I couldn't have known’: Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. British Journal of Social Psychology. 39(3). 313–325. 62 indexed citations

16.

Lerner, Jennifer S. & Philip E. Tetlock. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability.. Psychological Bulletin. 125(2). 255–275. 1479 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Tetlock, Philip E.. (1993). Behavior, society, and international conflict. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa). 26 indexed citations

18.

Sniderman, Paul M., Joseph Fletcher, Peter H. Russell, Philip E. Tetlock, & Brian J. Gaines. (1991). The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties. British Journal of Political Science. 21(3). 349–370. 50 indexed citations

19.

Sniderman, Paul M., Philip E. Tetlock, James M. Glaser, Donald P. Green, & Michael Hout. (1989). Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public. British Journal of Political Science. 19(1). 25–45. 113 indexed citations

20.

Tetlock, Philip E.. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.. Research in Organizational Behavior. 475 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact