Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations
1997780 citationsJack Citrin, Donald P. Green et al.profile →
European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information
2007734 citationsJohn Sides, Jack CitrinBritish Journal of Political Scienceprofile →
Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Citrin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Citrin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Citrin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Citrin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Citrin. The network helps show where Jack Citrin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Citrin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Citrin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Citrin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Citrin. Jack Citrin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abdelal, Rawi, Henry E. Brady, Donald A. Sylvan, et al.. (2009). Measuring Identity. Cambridge University Press eBooks.107 indexed citations
6.
Citrin, Jack, et al.. (2009). God and Country: Religion, Religiosity, and National Identity inAmerican Public Opinion. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Citrin, Jack & David Karol. (2009). Nominating the President. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks.2 indexed citations
8.
Citrin, Jack & Isaac William Martin. (2009). After the Tax Revolt: California's Proposition 13 Turns 30. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
Sides, John & Jack Citrin. (2007). European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information. British Journal of Political Science. 37(3). 477–504.734 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Citrin, Jack, David O. Sears, Christopher P. Muste, & Cara Wong. (2001). Multiculturalism in American Public Opinion. British Journal of Political Science. 31(2). 247–275.96 indexed citations
12.
Citrin, Jack, et al.. (2000). The Meaning of American Identity: Patterns of Ethnic Conflict and Consensus.5 indexed citations
13.
Citrin, Jack & Christopher P. Muste. (1999). Trust in government..246 indexed citations
14.
Citrin, Jack. (1995). Affirmative Action in the People's Court.. The Public interest.7 indexed citations
15.
Citrin, Jack. (1990). Language Politics and American Identity.. The Public interest.17 indexed citations
Citrin, Jack. (1965). United Nations peacekeeping activities : a case study in organizational task expansion.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.