Milton Lodge

12.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
53 papers, 7.1k citations indexed

About

Milton Lodge is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Milton Lodge has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 7.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 22 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Milton Lodge's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers) and Social Media and Politics (6 papers). Milton Lodge is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (22 papers) and Social Media and Politics (6 papers). Milton Lodge collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Ireland. Milton Lodge's co-authors include Charles S. Taber, Kathleen M. McGraw, Patrick J. Stroh, Marco R. Steenbergen, Howard Lavine, Bernard Tursky, Patrick Kraft, James L. Gibson, David V. Cross and Brad Verhulst and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Political Science Review and American Journal of Political Science.

In The Last Decade

Milton Lodge

53 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Hit Papers

Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2013 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k 2.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Milton Lodge United States 29 4.4k 3.2k 2.5k 676 486 53 7.1k
Charles S. Taber United States 21 4.2k 0.9× 2.4k 0.8× 1.9k 0.8× 578 0.9× 380 0.8× 39 5.9k
Yphtach Lelkes United States 29 4.0k 0.9× 2.9k 0.9× 2.5k 1.0× 632 0.9× 311 0.6× 74 6.1k
Nicholas A. Valentino United States 33 4.7k 1.1× 3.1k 1.0× 2.0k 0.8× 535 0.8× 165 0.3× 67 6.4k
Joshua A. Tucker United States 44 6.1k 1.4× 3.2k 1.0× 4.0k 1.6× 353 0.5× 268 0.6× 168 9.2k
W. Russell Neuman United States 22 2.9k 0.7× 1.5k 0.5× 2.6k 1.1× 403 0.6× 113 0.2× 58 5.2k
David O. Sears United States 49 8.3k 1.9× 4.1k 1.3× 1.6k 0.7× 2.3k 3.4× 504 1.0× 127 11.7k
John R. Hibbing United States 40 3.9k 0.9× 3.3k 1.0× 1.2k 0.5× 1.2k 1.8× 920 1.9× 129 7.1k
Leonie Huddy United States 30 4.2k 1.0× 2.9k 0.9× 1.0k 0.4× 878 1.3× 224 0.5× 65 6.5k
Hajo G. Boomgaarden Austria 42 3.7k 0.8× 2.4k 0.8× 2.8k 1.1× 261 0.4× 67 0.1× 164 6.4k
Robb Willer United States 42 4.5k 1.0× 594 0.2× 736 0.3× 1.7k 2.5× 1.1k 2.2× 96 6.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Milton Lodge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Milton Lodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milton Lodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milton Lodge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Milton Lodge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milton Lodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milton Lodge. The network helps show where Milton Lodge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Milton Lodge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Milton Lodge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Milton Lodge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Milton Lodge. Milton Lodge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gibson, James L., et al.. (2014). Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority. Law & Society Review. 48(4). 837–866. 82 indexed citations
2.
Taber, Charles S. & Milton Lodge. (2012). THE SCOPE AND GENERALITY OF AUTOMATIC AFFECTIVE BIASES IN POLITICAL THINKING: REPLY TO THE SYMPOSIUM. Critical Review. 24(2). 247–268. 13 indexed citations
3.
Erişen, Cengiz, Milton Lodge, & Charles S. Taber. (2012). Affective Contagion in Effortful Political Thinking. Political Psychology. 35(2). 187–206. 77 indexed citations
4.
Taber, Charles S., et al.. (2011). Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law. 36(6). 935–944. 86 indexed citations
5.
Verhulst, Brad, Milton Lodge, & Howard Lavine. (2010). The Attractiveness Halo: Why Some Candidates are Perceived More Favorably than Others. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 34(2). 111–117. 81 indexed citations
6.
Erişen, Cengiz, Milton Lodge, & Charles S. Taber. (2009). Does Affective Contagion Promote Coherent Political Thinking. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Taber, Charles S., et al.. (2009). A Computational Model of the Citizen as Motivated Reasoner: Modeling the Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Election. Political Behavior. 32(1). 1–28. 59 indexed citations
8.
Taber, Charles S., et al.. (2008). A Computational Model of the Citizen as Motivated Reasoner: Modeling the Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Election. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
9.
Lodge, Milton & Charles S. Taber. (2006). Experiments on the Automaticity of Political Beliefs. 3 indexed citations
10.
Lodge, Milton, et al.. (2004). A Computatiional Model of Voter-The Dynamics of Political Candidate Evaluation.. 362–363. 1 indexed citations
11.
Lupia, Arthur, Arthur T. Denzau, Paul M. Sniderman, et al.. (2000). Elements of Reason. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 99 indexed citations
12.
McGraw, Kathleen M. & Milton Lodge. (1996). Political information processing: A review essay. Political Communication. 13(1). 131–138. 6 indexed citations
13.
McGraw, Kathleen M., et al.. (1996). What's in a word?. Political Behavior. 18(3). 263–287. 19 indexed citations
14.
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, Pamela Johnston Conover, Stanley Feldman, & Arthur H. Miller. (1991). Where is the Schema? Critiques. American Political Science Review. 85(4). 1357–1380. 58 indexed citations
15.
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, & Patrick J. Stroh. (1989). An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review. 83(2). 399–419. 408 indexed citations
16.
Lodge, Milton, et al.. (1985). Partisan and ideological belief systems: Do they differ?. Political Behavior. 7(2). 147–166. 22 indexed citations
17.
Norpoth, Helmut & Milton Lodge. (1985). The Difference between Attitudes and Nonattitudes in the Mass Public: Just Measurements. American Journal of Political Science. 29(2). 291–291. 30 indexed citations
18.
Lodge, Milton, et al.. (1980). The meaning of party labels. Political Behavior. 2(3). 287–308. 17 indexed citations
19.
Lodge, Milton, Joseph Tanenhaus, David V. Cross, et al.. (1976). The calibration and cross-modal validation of ratio scales of political opinion in survey research. Social Science Research. 5(4). 325–347. 20 indexed citations
20.
Lodge, Milton, David V. Cross, Bernard Tursky, & Joseph Tanenhaus. (1975). The Psychophysical Scaling and Validation of a Political Support Scale. American Journal of Political Science. 19(4). 611–611. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026