Paul Fehrmann

3.5k total citations
13 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

Paul Fehrmann is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Fehrmann has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Paul Fehrmann's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). Paul Fehrmann is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). Paul Fehrmann collaborates with scholars based in United States. Paul Fehrmann's co-authors include Timothy Z. Keith, Thomas M. Reimers, Patti L. Harrison and Michael Hawkins and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of School Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Paul Fehrmann

8 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul Fehrmann United States 6 444 178 73 57 52 13 585
David J. León United States 4 270 0.6× 55 0.3× 99 1.4× 102 1.8× 22 0.4× 11 460
Brett R. Nelson Estonia 3 341 0.8× 140 0.8× 47 0.6× 89 1.6× 90 1.7× 3 493
Julie Basnett Estonia 3 341 0.8× 140 0.8× 47 0.6× 89 1.6× 90 1.7× 3 493
Josef Zollneritsch Estonia 3 342 0.8× 140 0.8× 47 0.6× 89 1.6× 91 1.8× 4 495
Kara A. Makara United Kingdom 11 212 0.5× 58 0.3× 37 0.5× 64 1.1× 44 0.8× 19 378
Patricia P. Willems United States 7 511 1.2× 202 1.1× 67 0.9× 56 1.0× 44 0.8× 14 599
Rubén Fernández-Alonso Spain 14 388 0.9× 175 1.0× 53 0.7× 39 0.7× 38 0.7× 30 592
Fatih Unlu United States 13 490 1.1× 47 0.3× 33 0.5× 170 3.0× 77 1.5× 51 602
Marjory Ebbeck Australia 12 448 1.0× 89 0.5× 161 2.2× 100 1.8× 23 0.4× 57 595
Els van Rooij Netherlands 9 319 0.7× 123 0.7× 37 0.5× 70 1.2× 39 0.8× 12 569

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Fehrmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Fehrmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Fehrmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Fehrmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Fehrmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Fehrmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Fehrmann. The network helps show where Paul Fehrmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Fehrmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Fehrmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Fehrmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Fehrmann. Paul Fehrmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
2.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2020). Advocacy engagement. Journal of Information Literacy. 14(1). 5 indexed citations
3.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2016). African American Academic Librarians: An Evidence Map Case Study Using Rapid Review Methodology. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. 35(4). 136–150.
4.
Fehrmann, Paul. (2015). Sources: Hidden Religion: The Greatest Mysteries and Symbols of the World's Religious Beliefs. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 54(3). 62–62.
5.
Fehrmann, Paul & Michael Hawkins. (2015). Systematic Literature Review Methods for Topics in The Humanities.
6.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2014). Using Systematic Review Methods for Topics in Philosophical and Theoretical Psychology..
7.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2013). Bibliographic Management Software: A Focus Group Study of the Preferences and Practices of Undergraduate Students. Public & Access Services Quarterly. 9(2). 110–120. 24 indexed citations
8.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2012). A Systematic Literature Review Model for Religion. 2(1).
9.
Fehrmann, Paul, et al.. (2011). Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 2(1). 15–32. 25 indexed citations
10.
Fehrmann, Paul. (1993). Internet resources for psychology. College & Research Libraries News. 54(9). 510–511. 1 indexed citations
11.
Keith, Timothy Z., et al.. (1987). The relation between adaptive behavior and intelligence: Testing alternative explanations. Journal of School Psychology. 25(1). 31–43. 43 indexed citations
12.
Fehrmann, Paul, Timothy Z. Keith, & Thomas M. Reimers. (1987). Home Influence on School Learning: Direct and Indirect Effects of Parental Involvement on High School Grades. The Journal of Educational Research. 80(6). 330–337. 276 indexed citations
13.
Keith, Timothy Z., et al.. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78(5). 373–380. 210 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026