Paul Bowman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Safety Research top 2%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Topics
- Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education (18 papers)Sports, Gender, and Society (10 papers)Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (7 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryEducational Philosophy and TheoryContemporary Political Theory
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Paul Bowman
49 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 197
- Safety Research 170
- Gender Studies 121
- Cultural Studies 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Bowman
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bowman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bowman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bowman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Bowman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bowman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bowman. The network helps show where Paul Bowman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Bowman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Bowman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Bowman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Bowman. Paul Bowman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | What can a martial body do for society? Or, theory before definition in Martial Arts Studies | 1 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Reading Rancière: critical dissensus | 4 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | From Cultural Studies to Cultural Analysis: A Controlled Reflection on the Formation of Method | 5 |
About Paul Bowman
Paul Bowman is a scholar working on Safety Research, Gender Studies and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 54 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education (18 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (10 papers) and Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (170 citations), Gender Studies (121 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (8 citations). Paul Bowman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include M. Meyer, Dan P. McAdams, Benjamin N. Judkins and Grant T McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Educational Philosophy and Theory and Contemporary Political Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.