Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Political Theory
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Political Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Political Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Political Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Contemporary Political Theory
This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Political Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Political Theory.
About Contemporary Political Theory
The 1.0k papers published in Contemporary Political Theory in the last decades have received a total of 11.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Contemporary Political Theory usually cover Philosophy (175 papers), Political Science and International Relations (332 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (392 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (148 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (90 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (84 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (71 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (58 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (41 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (40 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Political Theory are Lars Cornelissen, Adam David Morton, John Schwarzmantel, Michael Saward, Glen Coulthard, James A. Chamberlain, Andrew Robinson, Lasse Thomassen, Brian Milstein and Simon Tormey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.