O. de Silva

655 citations
9 papers · 452 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Animal testing and alternatives 9
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 2
    • Immunotoxicology and immune responses 3

O. de Silva

9 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

O. de Silva
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Small Animals 267
  • Drug Discovery 2
  • Dermatology 77
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Pharmaceutical Science 37
Replace David J. Esdaile with:
David J. Esdaile United Kingdom
Jalila Hibatallah France
José Cotovio France
U. Pfannenbecker Germany
S. Kalweit Germany
Pascal Portes France
Irene Manou Germany
D.M. Bagley United States
Penny Jones United States
J. Dupuis France
O. de Silva relative to David J. Esdaile United Kingdom David J. Esdaile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David J. Esdaile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. de Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. de Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. de Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. de Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. de Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. de Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. de Silva. The network helps show where O. de Silva may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. de Silva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. de Silva Line = papers co-authored together O. de Silva links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1998208
2 1999115
3 199242
4 199734
5 199716
6 199312
7 199510
8
Eye Irritation Testing: The Way Forward. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34.
20149
9 19946

About O. de Silva

O. de Silva is a scholar working on Small Animals, Immunology, Biomedical Engineering, Dermatology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (1 paper) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (267 citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations), Dermatology (77 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (37 citations). O. de Silva has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include W. Steiling, Marguerite Bracher, Pascal Courtellemont, Horst Spielmann, Manfred Liebsch, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter, Michael Balls, Wolfgang Pape, M. Csató and U. Pfannenbecker. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, Food and Chemical Toxicology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact