O. de Silva

650 total citations
9 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

O. de Silva is a scholar working on Small Animals, Immunology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, O. de Silva has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Small Animals, 3 papers in Immunology and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in O. de Silva's work include Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers) and Immunotoxicology and immune responses (3 papers). O. de Silva is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers) and Immunotoxicology and immune responses (3 papers). O. de Silva collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. O. de Silva's co-authors include W. Steiling, Marguerite Bracher, Pascal Courtellemont, Horst Spielmann, Manfred Liebsch, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter, Michael Balls, U. Pfannenbecker, Tobias Maurer and Dariusz Śladowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Food and Chemical Toxicology, Toxicology in Vitro and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

O. de Silva

9 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
O. de Silva France 8 273 91 77 75 61 9 449
D.M. Bagley United States 13 292 1.1× 45 0.5× 42 0.5× 91 1.2× 74 1.2× 16 473
S. Kalweit Germany 11 273 1.0× 117 1.3× 44 0.6× 80 1.1× 47 0.8× 14 573
J. Dupuis France 6 198 0.7× 86 0.9× 178 2.3× 57 0.8× 46 0.8× 10 462
José Cotovio France 14 274 1.0× 72 0.8× 184 2.4× 65 0.9× 49 0.8× 22 553
David J. Esdaile United Kingdom 12 230 0.8× 134 1.5× 84 1.1× 71 0.9× 52 0.9× 24 591
W.W. Lovell United Kingdom 12 297 1.1× 156 1.7× 228 3.0× 79 1.1× 59 1.0× 16 600
Jalila Hibatallah France 10 286 1.0× 49 0.5× 187 2.4× 70 0.9× 52 0.9× 13 537
U. Pfannenbecker Germany 15 547 2.0× 141 1.5× 97 1.3× 124 1.7× 119 2.0× 20 773
G.J.A. Oliver United Kingdom 9 122 0.4× 90 1.0× 71 0.9× 50 0.7× 13 0.2× 13 353
Irene Manou Germany 12 122 0.4× 88 1.0× 118 1.5× 32 0.4× 31 0.5× 20 468

Countries citing papers authored by O. de Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. de Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. de Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. de Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. de Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. de Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. de Silva. The network helps show where O. de Silva may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. de Silva

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. de Silva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. de Silva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with O. de Silva. O. de Silva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Balls, Michael, Nils O. Berg, Leon H. Bruner, et al.. (2014). Eye Irritation Testing: The Way Forward. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34.. PubMed. 27(1). 53–77. 9 indexed citations
2.
Steiling, W., Marguerite Bracher, Pascal Courtellemont, & O. de Silva. (1999). The HET–CAM, a Useful In Vitro Assay for Assessing the Eye Irritation Properties of Cosmetic Formulations and Ingredients. Toxicology in Vitro. 13(2). 375–384. 114 indexed citations
3.
Spielmann, Horst, Michael Balls, J. Dupuis, et al.. (1998). The International EU/COLIPA In Vitro Phototoxicity Validation Study: Results of Phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. Toxicology in Vitro. 12(3). 305–327. 207 indexed citations
4.
Silva, O. de, M. Cottin, R. Roguet, et al.. (1997). Evaluation of eye irritation potential: statistical analysis and tier testing strategies. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 35(1). 159–164. 16 indexed citations
5.
Spielmann, Horst, Manfred Liebsch, F. Moldenhauer, et al.. (1997). IRAG Working Group 2: CAM-based assays. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 35(1). 39–66. 33 indexed citations
6.
Spielmann, Horst, Manfred Liebsch, F. Moldenhauer, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter, & O. de Silva. (1995). Modern biostatistical methods for assessing in vitro/in vivo correlation of severely eye irritating chemicals in a validation study of in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye test. Toxicology in Vitro. 9(4). 549–556. 10 indexed citations
7.
Rougier, André, et al.. (1994). The use of in vitro methods in the ocular irritation assessment of cosmetic products. Toxicology in Vitro. 8(4). 893–905. 6 indexed citations
8.
Silva, O. de, et al.. (1993). Local lymph node assay: study of the in vitro proliferation and control of the specificity of the response by FACScan analysis. Toxicology in Vitro. 7(4). 299–303. 12 indexed citations
9.
Bagley, D.M., Leon H. Bruner, O. de Silva, et al.. (1992). An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro. 6(4). 275–284. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026