Toxicology in Vitro

5.9k papers and 150.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.9k papers published in Toxicology in Vitro in the last decades have received a total of 150.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Toxicology in Vitro usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.3k papers) and Cancer Research (812 papers) specifically the topics of Animal testing and alternatives (646 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (637 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (486 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toxicology in Vitro are W.G.E.J. Schoonen, H. Babich, Walter M.A. Westerink, Saber M. Hussain, Martin D. Barratt, Kevin T. Geiss, Jeffery M. Gearhart, J.J. Schlager, Ellen Borenfreund and Kwangsik Park.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toxicology in Vitro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toxicology in Vitro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toxicology in Vitro.

Countries where authors publish in Toxicology in Vitro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toxicology in Vitro. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toxicology in Vitro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toxicology in Vitro more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025