J. Dupuis

787 total citations
10 papers, 462 citations indexed

About

J. Dupuis is a scholar working on Dermatology, Small Animals and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Dupuis has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 462 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Dermatology, 3 papers in Small Animals and 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in J. Dupuis's work include Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). J. Dupuis is often cited by papers focused on Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). J. Dupuis collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and United Kingdom. J. Dupuis's co-authors include W. Steiling, W.W. Lovell, W. Diembeck, Marc Paye, U. Pfannenbecker, H. Beck, Horst Spielmann, Wolfgang Pape, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter and Frank Gerberick and has published in prestigious journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Critical Care Medicine and Food and Chemical Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

J. Dupuis

10 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

J. Dupuis

SA

DERMA

PS

MB

IMMUN

G. Klecak Switzerland

David J. Esdaile United Kingdom

O. de Silva France

Clive Roper United Kingdom

Pascal Courtellemont France

U. Pfannenbecker Germany

S. Kalweit Germany

Toshihiko Kasahara Japan

M. Csató Hungary

John Troutman United States

G. Klecak Switzerland

J. Dupuis

139 ×0.7

SA

355 ×2.0

DERMA

84 ×0.9

PS

115 ×1.3

MB

36 ×0.6

IMMUN

Citations per year, relative to J. Dupuis J. Dupuis (= 1×) peers G. Klecak

Countries citing papers authored by J. Dupuis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Dupuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Dupuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Dupuis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Dupuis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Dupuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Dupuis. The network helps show where J. Dupuis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Dupuis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Dupuis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Dupuis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Dupuis. J. Dupuis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Sarı, Ali, et al.. (2019). The EFQM method to compare battery performance. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 9(1). 41–54. 2 indexed citations

2.

Spielmann, Horst, Manfred Liebsch, Wolfgang Pape, et al.. (2015). EEC/COLIPA in vitro Photoirritancy Program: Results of the First Stage of Validation1. Current problems in dermatology. 23. 256–264. 4 indexed citations

3.

Jeudy, G., et al.. (2007). Toxidermie avec manifestations systémiques et sérologie lupique induites par l’infliximab. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie. 134(3). 268–271. 2 indexed citations

4.

Diembeck, W., H. Beck, F. Benech-Kieffer, et al.. (1999). Test Guidelines for In Vitro Assessment of Dermal Absorption and Percutaneous Penetration of Cosmetic Ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 37(2-3). 191–205. 131 indexed citations

5.

Spielmann, Horst, Michael Balls, J. Dupuis, et al.. (1998). The International EU/COLIPA In Vitro Phototoxicity Validation Study: Results of Phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. Toxicology in Vitro. 12(3). 305–327. 207 indexed citations

6.

Darouiche, Rabih O., Issam Raad, Andrea Gabrielli, et al.. (1998). COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS IMPREGNATED WITH MINOCYCLINE AND RIFAMPIN VS CATHETERS IMPREGNATED WITH CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE AND SILVER SULFADIAZINE. Critical Care Medicine. 26(Supplement). 128A–128A. 2 indexed citations

7.

Spielmann, Horst, Michael Balls, J. Dupuis, et al.. (1998). A Study on UV Filter Chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC, in the In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 26(5). 679–708. 39 indexed citations

8.

Walker, A.P., et al.. (1996). Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 34(7). 651–660. 42 indexed citations

9.

Sherertz, Robert J., Stephen O. Heard, Issam Raad, et al.. (1996). Gamma radiation-sterilized, triple-lumen catheters coated with a low concentration of chlorhexidine were not efficacious at preventing catheter infections in intensive care unit patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 40(9). 1995–1997. 24 indexed citations

10.

Bouillon, Claude, Leon H. Bruner, M. Chamberlain, et al.. (1995). Development and validation of non-animal tests and testing strategies: the identification of a coordinated response to the challenge and the opportunity presented by the Sixth Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive (76/768/EEC). Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact