Drug Discovery
- Topics
- Pharmacology and Nanomedicine ResearchMedicinal Plant ResearchDiverse Scientific Research Studies
In The Last Decade
Drug Discovery
696 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Drug Discovery
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Drug Discovery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Drug Discovery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drug Discovery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Drug Discovery
This network shows the impact of papers covering Drug Discovery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Drug Discovery.
About Drug Discovery
2.7k papers covering Drug Discovery have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Drug Discovery are most often about the specific topic of Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research, Medicinal Plant Research and Diverse Scientific Research Studies and also cover the fields of Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science and General Health Professions. Papers citing work on Drug Discovery are usually about Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology and Food Science. Some of the most active scholars covering Drug Discovery are Mahmoud Hussein Hadwan, B. Wolters, Adolf Nahrstedt, U. Eilert, S. Vijaya Laxmi, Ali Esmail Al‐Snafi, D. Pesando, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Samiran S. Gauri and Arup Roy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.