Richard N. Hill

2.1k total citations
47 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Richard N. Hill is a scholar working on Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard N. Hill has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Small Animals, 8 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Richard N. Hill's work include Animal testing and alternatives (18 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers). Richard N. Hill is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (18 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers). Richard N. Hill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Richard N. Hill's co-authors include A. J. M. Slovak, P.M. Hurley, William S. Stokes, Jennifer Seed, Samuel M. Cohen, Timothy P. Pastoor, M.E. Meek, Dorothy E. Patton, David G. Longfellow and John R. Bucher and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Environmental Health Perspectives and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Richard N. Hill

45 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard N. Hill United States 19 359 289 274 218 212 47 1.5k
Susan P. Felter United States 22 579 1.6× 268 0.9× 244 0.9× 135 0.6× 270 1.3× 38 1.5k
Robert H. Hill United States 25 529 1.5× 312 1.1× 33 0.1× 194 0.9× 336 1.6× 94 1.9k
William M. Kluwe United States 26 746 2.1× 402 1.4× 91 0.3× 459 2.1× 221 1.0× 67 2.0k
Bryan D. Hardin United States 18 394 1.1× 358 1.2× 63 0.2× 121 0.6× 147 0.7× 35 909
G. Leng Germany 25 736 2.1× 403 1.4× 47 0.2× 190 0.9× 628 3.0× 68 1.6k
Barbara C. Pence United States 24 196 0.5× 148 0.5× 32 0.1× 551 2.5× 108 0.5× 53 2.0k
Charles L. Gaworski United States 19 486 1.4× 382 1.3× 55 0.2× 211 1.0× 145 0.7× 35 1.1k
J.J. van Hemmen Netherlands 23 303 0.8× 121 0.4× 109 0.4× 240 1.1× 477 2.3× 66 1.3k
Agnieszka Kinsner‐Ovaskainen Italy 22 277 0.8× 74 0.3× 217 0.8× 292 1.3× 104 0.5× 33 1.3k
J.C. Topham United Kingdom 13 269 0.7× 366 1.3× 70 0.3× 257 1.2× 240 1.1× 27 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard N. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard N. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard N. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard N. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard N. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard N. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard N. Hill. The network helps show where Richard N. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard N. Hill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard N. Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard N. Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard N. Hill. Richard N. Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Winner, Laura, et al.. (2017). Use of Cascading A3s to Drive Systemwide Improvement. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 43(8). 422–428. 1 indexed citations
2.
Axelrad, Daniel A., Karl P. Baetcke, Charles Griffiths, et al.. (2005). Risk Assessment For Benefits Analysis: Framework for Analysis of A Thyroid-Disrupting Chemical. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 68(11-12). 837–855. 8 indexed citations
3.
Meek, M.E., John R. Bucher, Samuel M. Cohen, et al.. (2003). A Framework for Human Relevance Analysis of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 33(6). 591–653. 325 indexed citations
4.
Stokes, William S. & Richard N. Hill. (2002). The role of ICCVAM in evaluating new and alternative test methods.. PubMed. 31(7). 26–32. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sailstad, Denise M., David G. Hattan, Richard N. Hill, & William S. Stokes. (2001). ICCVAM Evaluation of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 34(3). 249–257. 117 indexed citations
7.
Hill, Richard N. & William S. Stokes. (1999). Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Alternatives. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 8(1). 73–79. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hill, Richard N., M. Crisp, P.M. Hurley, S. Leonard Rosenthal, & Gordon C. Hard. (1998). ASSESSMENT OF THYROID FOLLICULAR CELL TUMORS. 51 indexed citations
9.
Alexander, R., Richard N. Hill, William J. Lipham, Kevin J. Weatherwax, & Habib El-Moalem. (1998). Remifentanil prevents an increase in intraocular pressure after succinylcholine and tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 81(4). 606–607. 33 indexed citations
10.
Hill, Richard N., Thomas M. Crisp, P.M. Hurley, S. Leonard Rosenthal, & Dharm V. Singh. (1998). Risk assessment of thyroid follicular cell tumors.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 106(8). 447–457. 85 indexed citations
11.
Silva, O. de, M. Cottin, R. Roguet, et al.. (1997). Evaluation of eye irritation potential: statistical analysis and tier testing strategies. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 35(1). 159–164. 16 indexed citations
12.
Bradlaw, June A., et al.. (1997). Practical application of non-whole animal alternatives: summary of IRAG workshop on eye irritation testing. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 35(1). 175–178. 19 indexed citations
13.
Lipnick, Robert L., Joseph A. Cotruvo, Richard N. Hill, et al.. (1995). Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 33(3). 223–231. 187 indexed citations
14.
Gupta, K.C., Wiley Chambers, S. Green, et al.. (1993). An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 31(2). 117–121. 11 indexed citations
15.
Springer, Janet A., Wiley Chambers, S. Green, et al.. (1993). Number of animals for sequential testing. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 31(2). 105–109. 8 indexed citations
16.
Chambers, Wiley, S. Green, K.C. Gupta, et al.. (1993). Use of ophthalmic topical anaesthetics. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 31(2). 95–98. 7 indexed citations
17.
Hill, Richard N., et al.. (1987). Proliferative Hepatocellular Lesions of the Rat: Review and Future Use in Risk Assessment. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 3(1). 145–166. 16 indexed citations
18.
Hill, Richard N., et al.. (1975). Inability of Angiotensin to Stimulate RNA Synthesis in Isolated Rat Atria. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 148(2). 418–419. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hill, Richard N., et al.. (1975). Genetic Control of Chloroform Toxicity in Mice. Science. 190(4210). 159–161. 45 indexed citations
20.
Aldous, Joan & Richard N. Hill. (1965). Social Cohesion, Lineage Type, and Intergenerational Transmission. Social Forces. 43(4). 471–482. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026