Ning Du

640 citations
29 papers · 411 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ning Du

28 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Ning Du
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • General Decision Sciences 182
  • Accounting 167
  • Finance 142
  • Management Science and Operations Research 132
  • Safety Research 41
Replace Christoph Merkle with:
Christoph Merkle Germany
Mark W. Riepe United States
Andrey Kudryavtsev Israel
Veronika Köbberling Netherlands
Gregory E. Sierra United States
Maurry Tamarkin United States
Duncan James United States
Edward J. Joyce United States
Lawrence J. Jin United States
Michael M. Pompian United States
Ning Du relative to Christoph Merkle Germany Christoph Merkle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Christoph Merkle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ning Du

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Du's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Du with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Du more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Du

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Du. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Du. The network helps show where Ning Du may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ning Du, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ning Du Line = papers co-authored together Ning Du links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200590
2 201063
3 200760
4 200729
5 200920
6 201717
7 201517
8
The Coherence and Consistency of Investors' Probability Judgments
200714
9 202213
10 201113
11 20159
12 20149
13 20117
14 20116
15 20146
16
The Appeal of Vague Financial Forecasts
20115
17 20155
18
Does Past Volatility Affect Investors' Price Forecasts and Confidence Judgments?
20074
19
Why isn't comprehensive income comprehensible?
20164
20 20184

About Ning Du

Ning Du is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research and Management Information Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (19 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (10 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (182 citations), Accounting (167 citations), Finance (142 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (132 citations) and Safety Research (41 citations). Ning Du has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David V. Budescu, Thomas C. Omer, Kevin Stevens, John E. McEnroe, Jianfang Ye, Joshua Ronen, Alessandra Allini, Marco Maffei, Marjorie K. Shelley and Hui Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Finance, Management Science, Managerial Auditing Journal, Behavioral Research in Accounting and Meditari Accountancy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact