John E. McEnroe

540 total citations
37 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

John E. McEnroe is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. McEnroe has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Accounting, 15 papers in Strategy and Management and 8 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in John E. McEnroe's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (28 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers). John E. McEnroe is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (28 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers). John E. McEnroe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Botswana and Slovenia. John E. McEnroe's co-authors include Stanley C. Martens, Mark D. Sullivan, Ning Du and Kevin Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Accounting Organizations and Society and Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.

In The Last Decade

John E. McEnroe

32 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John E. McEnroe United States	10	325	127	110	44	43	37	391
Reza Espahbodi United States	10	412 1.3×	191 1.5×	76 0.7×	114 2.6×	56 1.3×	28	502
Irene Tutticci Australia	10	376 1.2×	187 1.5×	59 0.5×	137 3.1×	80 1.9×	26	472
Aaron D. Crabtree United States	9	302 0.9×	146 1.1×	112 1.0×	65 1.5×	71 1.7×	18	392
Phillip T. Lamoreaux United States	13	625 1.9×	195 1.5×	103 0.9×	121 2.8×	80 1.9×	32	703
Evelyn Patterson United States	10	366 1.1×	104 0.8×	52 0.5×	59 1.3×	56 1.3×	17	422
David Citron United Kingdom	16	744 2.3×	285 2.2×	99 0.9×	170 3.9×	77 1.8×	31	814
Chrystelle Richard France	7	318 1.0×	89 0.7×	106 1.0×	57 1.3×	26 0.6×	11	383
Kevan L. Jensen United States	11	408 1.3×	106 0.8×	77 0.7×	59 1.3×	97 2.3×	18	462
Al L. Hartgraves United States	5	224 0.7×	106 0.8×	68 0.6×	54 1.2×	44 1.0×	6	315
Benjamin P. Foster United States	11	272 0.8×	101 0.8×	61 0.6×	75 1.7×	35 0.8×	38	377

Countries citing papers authored by John E. McEnroe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. McEnroe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. McEnroe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. McEnroe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. McEnroe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. McEnroe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. McEnroe. The network helps show where John E. McEnroe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. McEnroe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. McEnroe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. McEnroe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. McEnroe. John E. McEnroe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (2023). THE CURRENT STATUS OF AUDITORS’ AND INVESTORS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP. 23(1). 1 indexed citations

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (2020). An empirical analysis of an application of an alternative measurement model on international accounting standard 33, earnings per share. Accounting Research Journal. 33(2). 381–390. 1 indexed citations

Du, Ning & John E. McEnroe. (2015). Is Cash Flow per Share Paternalism by U.S. Accounting Rule Makers Warranted? An Empirical Study. International Journal of Financial Research. 6(4).

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (2014). Financial Analyst Survey of SFAS 123(R) - Employee Stock Option Compensation Expense. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

McEnroe, John E. & Mark D. Sullivan. (2013). An examination of the perceptions of auditors and chief financial officers regarding principles versus rules based accounting standards. Research in Accounting Regulation. 25(2). 196–207. 10 indexed citations

McEnroe, John E. & Mark D. Sullivan. (2011). An Analysis of the Content of Form 20-F U.S. GAAP Reconciliation by Foreign Entities Employing IFRS: Is the SEC IFRS Roadmap Premature?. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies journal. 15(1). 117. 1 indexed citations

Du, Ning & John E. McEnroe. (2011). Are Multiple Analyst Earnings Forecasts Better Than the Single Forecast?. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 12(1). 1–8. 7 indexed citations

McEnroe, John E.. (2011). Cash Flow Accounting: is It Time For Increased Disclosures?. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 12(1). 47–47.

McEnroe, John E. & Mark D. Sullivan. (2011). Individual investors’ attitudes toward the acceptance of International Financial Reporting Standards in the United States. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation. 20(1). 20–31. 15 indexed citations

10.

McEnroe, John E.. (2007). Perceptions of the Effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on Earnings Management Practices. Research in Accounting Regulation. 19. 137–157. 5 indexed citations

11.

McEnroe, John E. & Stanley C. Martens. (2004). It’s time for a true and fair view. Accounting Forum. 28(4). 427–430. 4 indexed citations

12.

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (2003). AN ANALYSIS OF THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION’S OLIGARCHY: THE AUDITING STANDARDS BOARD. Research in Accounting Regulation. 16. 29–44. 4 indexed citations

13.

McEnroe, John E. & Stanley C. Martens. (2001). Auditors' and Investors' Perceptions of the “Expectation Gap”. Accounting Horizons. 15(4). 345–358. 172 indexed citations

14.

McEnroe, John E.. (1996). An examination of attitudes involving cash flow accounting: Implications for the content of cash flow statements. The International Journal of Accounting. 31(2). 161–174. 18 indexed citations

15.

McEnroe, John E.. (1994). An Examination of Voting Behavior of the ASB. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 9(1). 117–141. 7 indexed citations

16.

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (1993). Shamrock Shirt Co.'s non-interest bearing note. Accounting Education. 2(3). 231–236. 2 indexed citations

17.

Martens, Stanley C. & John E. McEnroe. (1991). Interprofessional struggles over definition: Lawyers, accountants and illegal acts. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2(4). 375–384. 17 indexed citations

18.

McEnroe, John E.. (1991). Attitudes Towards the Term ‘Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’. Accounting and Business Research. 21(82). 157–162.

19.

McEnroe, John E.. (1989). Cash Flow Accounting Revisited: A Note on a Partial Replication of the Lee Study. Abacus. 25(1). 56–60. 7 indexed citations

20.

McEnroe, John E., et al.. (1983). Voting patterns of big eight representatives in setting accounting and auditing standards. Journal of Business Research. 11(1). 77–89. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact