Marco Maffei
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rosanna SpanòLuca FerriAdele CaldarelliAlessandra AlliniAnnamaria ZampellaRiccardo MacchioniMassimo AriaNing Du
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (17 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marco Maffei
35 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Accounting 144
- Management Information Systems 94
- Strategy and Management 93
- Economics and Econometrics 63
- Information Systems 58
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Maffei
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Maffei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Maffei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Maffei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Maffei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Maffei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Maffei. The network helps show where Marco Maffei may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Maffei
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Maffei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Maffei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Maffei. Marco Maffei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | Compliance to IFRS 7. Evidence from the Italian banking sector | 2 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Ethics in Risk Management Practices: Insights from the Italian Mutual Credit Co-operative Banks | 3 |
About Marco Maffei
Marco Maffei is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (17 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (144 citations), Management Information Systems (94 citations) and Strategy and Management (93 citations). Marco Maffei has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rosanna Spanò, Luca Ferri, Adele Caldarelli, Alessandra Allini, Annamaria Zampella, Riccardo Macchioni, Massimo Aria, Ning Du, Margaret Woods and Domenico Campa. Their work appears in journals such as Business Strategy and the Environment, Management Decision and International Business Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.