Meditari Accountancy Research

568 papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 568 papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research usually cover Accounting (313 papers), Strategy and Management (309 papers) and Management Information Systems (155 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (238 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (227 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Meditari Accountancy Research are Warren Maroun, Charl de Villiers, John Dumay, James Guthrie, Carol Tilt, Sumit Lodhia, Elda du Toit, Kathyayini Kathy Rao, Jill Atkins and Matteo La Torre.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Meditari Accountancy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Meditari Accountancy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Meditari Accountancy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meditari Accountancy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025