Journal of Behavioral Finance

604 papers and 9.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 604 papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance usually cover Finance (472 papers), Economics and Econometrics (306 papers) and Accounting (267 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (457 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (153 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Behavioral Finance are John R. Nofsinger, Tim Loughran, Lisa R. Szykman, Julie R. Agnew, Bill McDonald, Tao Chen, Geoffrey C. Williams, Shuming Liu, Xuequn Wang and Matthias Uhl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Behavioral Finance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Behavioral Finance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Behavioral Finance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Behavioral Finance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025