Behavioral Research in Accounting

318 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 318 papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting usually cover Accounting (200 papers), Management Information Systems (94 papers) and Safety Research (87 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (185 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (91 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral Research in Accounting are Steven E. Kaplan, Linda M. Parsons, Sally K. Widener, Richard C. Hatfield, Wim A. Van der Stede, Richard Fisher, Donna D. Bobek, Scott L. Summers, David A. Wood and Robert Pinsker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting.

Countries where authors publish in Behavioral Research in Accounting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral Research in Accounting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral Research in Accounting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Research in Accounting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025