Nicholas Carah
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Marketing top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel AngusAmy Shields DobsonCarla MeurkBrady RobardsWayne HallEric LouwFlorentine MartinoKathryn Backholer
- Topics
- Digital Marketing and Social Media (15 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (10 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesMarketingCommunication
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Carah
57 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Sociology and Political Science 455
- Gender Studies 160
- Epidemiology 148
- Marketing 145
- Clinical Psychology 124
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Carah
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Carah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Carah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Carah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Carah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Carah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Carah. The network helps show where Nicholas Carah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Carah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Carah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Carah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Carah. Nicholas Carah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | NOVEL METHODS TO INFORM POLICY EVALUATIONS IN NIGHT TIME ENTERTAINMENT PRECINCTS | 0 |
| 18 | Media and Society: Production, Content and Participation | 12 |
| 19 | Media & society : production, content & participation | 4 |
| 20 | Leveraging social media | 1 |
About Nicholas Carah
Nicholas Carah is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Marketing and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 60 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (15 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (10 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (160 citations), Marketing (145 citations) and Communication (107 citations). Nicholas Carah has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Angus, Amy Shields Dobson, Carla Meurk, Brady Robards, Wayne Hall, Eric Louw, Florentine Martino, Kathryn Backholer, Jennifer Brown and Bridget Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advertising, New Media & Society and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.