Nia Young

15 total papers · 436 total citations
5 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

Nia Young is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nia Young has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Nia Young's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (2 papers). Nia Young is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (2 papers). Nia Young collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Nia Young's co-authors include Leah Jones, Emma K. Hughes, Virginia C. Mueller Gathercole, Enlli Thomas, Nestor Viñas‐Guasch, Emily J. Roberts and Cynog Prys and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism and Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.

In The Last Decade

Nia Young

4 papers receiving 250 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nia Young 216 213 31 19 16 5 253
Emma K. Hughes 217 1.0× 214 1.0× 31 1.0× 19 1.0× 16 1.0× 4 252
Nele Verreyt 191 0.9× 246 1.2× 39 1.3× 27 1.4× 12 0.8× 7 315
Daniel Koo 194 0.9× 189 0.9× 55 1.8× 6 0.3× 33 2.1× 6 265
Lori B. Astheimer 154 0.7× 243 1.1× 89 2.9× 14 0.7× 15 0.9× 8 290
Erin J. White 232 1.1× 260 1.2× 59 1.9× 19 1.0× 45 2.8× 7 331
Ala Mullangi 94 0.4× 204 1.0× 59 1.9× 13 0.7× 9 0.6× 7 307
Racha Zebib 232 1.1× 209 1.0× 17 0.5× 9 0.5× 13 0.8× 11 277
Nora Fieder 83 0.4× 164 0.8× 40 1.3× 11 0.6× 22 1.4× 11 206
Jessica Overweg 127 0.6× 114 0.5× 45 1.5× 25 1.3× 33 2.1× 6 185
Claudia Galluzzi 190 0.9× 242 1.1× 105 3.4× 10 0.5× 15 0.9× 11 291

Countries citing papers authored by Nia Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nia Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nia Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nia Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nia Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nia Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nia Young. The network helps show where Nia Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nia Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nia Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nia Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nia Young. Nia Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026