Mark Richard
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Canadian Identity and History 5
- Race, History, and American Society 3
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 9
- Co-authors
- Graeme Forbes (1 shared paper)Lynne Rudder Baker (1 shared paper)William G. Lycan (1 shared paper)Mark Crimmins (1 shared paper)George W. Wilson (1 shared paper)Mark E. Steiner (1 shared paper)Mario Gómez‐Torrente (1 shared paper)Scott Soames (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (6 papers)The Philosophical Review (4 papers)The New England Quarterly (2 papers)Noûs (2 papers)Midwest Studies in Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark Richard
41 papers receiving 703 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Philosophy 541
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 570
- History and Philosophy of Science 166
- Language and Linguistics 157
- Artificial Intelligence 170
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Richard
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Richard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Richard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Richard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Richard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Richard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Richard. The network helps show where Mark Richard may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Richard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 119 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 60 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 56 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 6 |
About Mark Richard
Mark Richard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 48 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (3 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (541 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (570 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (166 citations), Language and Linguistics (157 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (170 citations). Mark Richard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Forbes, Lynne Rudder Baker, William G. Lycan, Mark Crimmins, George W. Wilson, Mark E. Steiner, Mario Gómez‐Torrente, Scott Soames, Bernard Linsky and Robert Stalnaker. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review, The New England Quarterly, Noûs and Midwest Studies in Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.