Penelope Maddy

4.9k citations
53 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Penelope Maddy

53 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Penelope Maddy
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Theoretical Computer Science 247
  • History and Philosophy of Science 765
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 783
  • Philosophy 480
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 219
Replace Paul Benacerraf with:
Paul Benacerraf United States
Gottlob Frege Germany
Bob Hale United Kingdom
Hartry Field United States
Charles Parsons United States
Richard G. Heck United States
Mark Balaguer United States
Øystein Linnebo Norway
Otávio Bueno United States
Jody Azzouni United States
Penelope Maddy relative to Paul Benacerraf United States Paul Benacerraf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Paul Benacerraf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Penelope Maddy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penelope Maddy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penelope Maddy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penelope Maddy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penelope Maddy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penelope Maddy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penelope Maddy. The network helps show where Penelope Maddy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Penelope Maddy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Penelope Maddy Line = papers co-authored together Penelope Maddy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992199
2 2000187
3 2007118
4 1992100
5 200774
6 198869
7 201163
8 198062
9 200054
10 198842
11 198335
12 198833
13 200230
14
Externalism, naturalism, nominalism, and mathematics
200125
15 201322
16 200820
17 199518
18 201418
19 200118
20 199616

About Penelope Maddy

Penelope Maddy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Geometry and Topology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (26 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (5 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (247 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (765 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (783 citations), Philosophy (480 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (219 citations). Penelope Maddy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Harvey Friedman, John R. Steel, Solomon Feferman, Nathan Salmón, William G. Lycan, Gideon Rosen, Jouko Väänánen, Stewart Shapiro, Jamie Tappenden and Michael D. Resnik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, The Journal of Philosophy, Noûs and Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact