Graeme Forbes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Mark JohnstonChristopher PeacockeJoseph MeliaMark RichardJan SchreursDavid M. ShawM. L. KeeleyChris King
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (22 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomRussia
In The Last Decade
Graeme Forbes
62 papers receiving 926 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 716
- Philosophy 518
- History and Philosophy of Science 301
- Artificial Intelligence 221
- Cognitive Neuroscience 101
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Forbes
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Forbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Forbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Forbes. The network helps show where Graeme Forbes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme Forbes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme Forbes. Graeme Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | Lexicon of Oman Subsurface Stratigraphy | 60 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Languages of possibility : an essay in philosophical logic | 22 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 105 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Graeme Forbes
Graeme Forbes is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (22 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (301 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (716 citations) and Philosophy (518 citations). Graeme Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Johnston, Christopher Peacocke, Joseph Melia, Mark Richard, Jan Schreurs, David M. Shaw, M. L. Keeley, Chris King, Rachael Briggs and David Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Fisheries Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.