Nathan S. Rose

3.9k total citations
51 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Nathan S. Rose is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan S. Rose has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 30 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 12 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Nathan S. Rose's work include Cognitive Functions and Memory (23 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers). Nathan S. Rose is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Functions and Memory (23 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers). Nathan S. Rose collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Nathan S. Rose's co-authors include Fergus I. M. Craik, Matthias Kliegel, Peter G. Rendell, Alexandra Hering, Joel Myerson, Joshua J. LaRocque, Michael J. Starrett, Bradley R. Postle, Sandra Hale and Mark A. McDaniel and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Nathan S. Rose

50 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Nathan S. Rose
Audrey Duarte United States
Carter Wendelken United States
Rico Fischer Germany
Mark E. Faust United States
Camarin E. Rolle United States
Nathan S. Rose
Citations per year, relative to Nathan S. Rose Nathan S. Rose (= 1×) peers Takashi Tsukiura

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan S. Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan S. Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan S. Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan S. Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan S. Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan S. Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan S. Rose. The network helps show where Nathan S. Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan S. Rose

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan S. Rose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan S. Rose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan S. Rose. Nathan S. Rose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rose, Nathan S., et al.. (2024). A dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in working memory.. Psychology and Aging. 39(4). 436–455.
2.
Rose, Nathan S., et al.. (2023). Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 85(5). 1499–1516. 4 indexed citations
3.
Henry, Julie D., Alexandra Hering, Simon Haines, et al.. (2021). Acting with the future in mind: Testing competing prospective memory interventions.. Psychology and Aging. 36(4). 491–503. 8 indexed citations
4.
Henry, Julie D., Gill Terrett, Sarah A. Grainger, et al.. (2020). Implementation intentions and prospective memory function in late adulthood.. Psychology and Aging. 35(8). 1105–1114. 12 indexed citations
5.
Gosseries, Olivia, Qing Yu, Joshua J. LaRocque, et al.. (2018). Parietal-Occipital Interactions Underlying Control- and Representation-Related Processes in Working Memory for Nonspatial Visual Features. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(18). 4357–4366. 32 indexed citations
6.
Hering, Alexandra, Matthias Kliegel, Peter G. Rendell, Fergus I. M. Craik, & Nathan S. Rose. (2018). Prospective Memory Is a Key Predictor of Functional Independence in Older Adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 24(6). 640–645. 80 indexed citations
7.
Agarwal, Pooja K., Jason R. Finley, Nathan S. Rose, & Henry L. Roediger. (2016). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory. 25(6). 764–771. 81 indexed citations
8.
Rose, Nathan S., Peter G. Rendell, Alexandra Hering, et al.. (2015). Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults’ prospective memory following training with the Virtual Week computer game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 9. 592–592. 77 indexed citations
9.
Craik, Fergus I. M., Nathan S. Rose, & Nigel Gopie. (2015). Recognition without awareness: Encoding and retrieval factors.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(5). 1271–1281. 15 indexed citations
10.
Meltzer, Jed A., et al.. (2015). Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall. Memory & Cognition. 44(2). 307–329. 7 indexed citations
11.
Rose, Nathan S., Lin Luo, Ellen Bialystok, et al.. (2015). Cognitive processes in the Breakfast Task: Planning and monitoring.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 69(3). 252–263. 15 indexed citations
13.
Hering, Alexandra, Peter G. Rendell, Nathan S. Rose, Katharina M. Schnitzspahn, & Matthias Kliegel. (2014). Prospective memory training in older adults and its relevance for successful aging. Psychological Research. 78(6). 892–904. 53 indexed citations
14.
Foster, Erin R., Nathan S. Rose, Mark A. McDaniel, & Peter G. Rendell. (2013). Prospective memory in Parkinson disease during a virtual week: Effects of both prospective and retrospective demands.. Neuropsychology. 27(2). 170–181. 42 indexed citations
15.
Zinke, Katharina, et al.. (2013). Working memory training and transfer in older adults: Effects of age, baseline performance, and training gains.. Developmental Psychology. 50(1). 304–315. 177 indexed citations
16.
Rose, Nathan S. & Fergus I. M. Craik. (2012). A processing approach to the working memory/long-term memory distinction: Evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(4). 1019–1029. 51 indexed citations
17.
Kliegel, Matthias, Mareike Altgassen, Alexandra Hering, & Nathan S. Rose. (2011). A process-model based approach to prospective memory impairment in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 49(8). 2166–2177. 129 indexed citations
18.
Hale, Sandra, Nathan S. Rose, Joel Myerson, et al.. (2011). The structure of working memory abilities across the adult life span.. Psychology and Aging. 26(1). 92–110. 99 indexed citations
19.
Aberle, Ingo, Peter G. Rendell, Nathan S. Rose, Mark A. McDaniel, & Matthias Kliegel. (2010). The age prospective memory paradox: Young adults may not give their best outside of the lab.. Developmental Psychology. 46(6). 1444–1453. 79 indexed citations
20.
Rose, Nathan S., Joel Myerson, Henry L. Roediger, & Sandra Hale. (2010). Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: Evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 36(2). 471–483. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026