Natalie J. Webb
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rikki AbzugAnn BlandfordAnne AdamsMichael D. HarrisonAlan DixHarold ThimblebyPaul CairnsAnna L. Cox
- Topics
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (10 papers)Taxation and Compliance Studies (6 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Natalie J. Webb
29 papers receiving 568 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 196
- Strategy and Management 109
- Human-Computer Interaction 95
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 64
- Reproductive Medicine 64
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie J. Webb
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie J. Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie J. Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie J. Webb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie J. Webb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie J. Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie J. Webb. The network helps show where Natalie J. Webb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie J. Webb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie J. Webb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie J. Webb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie J. Webb. Natalie J. Webb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Improving Performance Measurement in Defense Organizations | 3 |
| 10 | 236 | |
| 11 | Are We Driving Strategic Results or Metric Mania? Evaluating Performance in the Public Sector | 5 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Are We Driving Strategic Results or Metric Mania | 2 |
| 16 | Evaluating Executive Performance in the Public Sector | 6 |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Natalie J. Webb
Natalie J. Webb is a scholar working on Public Administration, Management Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 31 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (10 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (6 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (95 citations), Public Administration (33 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (64 citations). Natalie J. Webb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rikki Abzug, Ann Blandford, Anne Adams, Michael D. Harrison, Alan Dix, Harold Thimbleby, Paul Cairns, Anna L. Cox, Amy Farmer and Laura R. Peck. Their work appears in journals such as Health Services Research, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly and Applied Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.