Natalie Goulter

1.2k citations
46 papers · 799 indexed · h-index 16

Natalie Goulter

44 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Natalie Goulter
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Clinical Psychology 678
  • Social Psychology 174
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Health 48
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
Replace Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous with:
Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous Cyprus
Matilda E. Nowakowski Canada
Kit K. Elam United States
Liam Mahedy United Kingdom
Richard E. Tremblay Canada
Sunhye Bai United States
Nina Spröber Germany
Erik Bulten Netherlands
Jennifer S. Mascaro United States
Jackson A. Goodnight United States
Natalie Goulter relative to Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous Cyprus Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Goulter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Goulter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Goulter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Goulter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Goulter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Goulter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Goulter. The network helps show where Natalie Goulter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Goulter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Goulter Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Goulter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20243
3 20236
4 20232
5 202316
6 20231
7 202345
8 20238
9 20224
10 20225
11 20221
12 20226
13 202210
14 20211
15 202111
16 20219
17 202081
18 201820
19 201652
20 2015134

About Natalie Goulter

Natalie Goulter is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (24 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (19 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (7 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (678 citations), Social Psychology (174 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations). Natalie Goulter has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eva R. Kimonis, Robert J. McMahon, Marlene M. Moretti, Stephanie G. Craig, Kostas A. Fanti, Xenia Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous, Kenneth A. Dodge, Dave S. Pasalich, Jason R. Hall and Patrick J. Kennealy. Their work appears in journals such as Development and Psychopathology, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review and Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026