Kit K. Elam
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gordon T. HaroldDaniel S. ShawLaurie ChassinLeslie D. LeveAnita ThaparDavid ReissMisaki N. NatsuakiJenae M. Neiderhiser
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (30 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kit K. Elam
46 papers receiving 938 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Clinical Psychology 614
- Social Psychology 184
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 175
- Psychiatry and Mental health 156
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
Countries citing papers authored by Kit K. Elam
This map shows the geographic impact of Kit K. Elam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kit K. Elam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kit K. Elam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kit K. Elam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kit K. Elam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kit K. Elam. The network helps show where Kit K. Elam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kit K. Elam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kit K. Elam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kit K. Elam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kit K. Elam. Kit K. Elam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Kit K. Elam
Kit K. Elam is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (30 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (614 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations). Kit K. Elam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon T. Harold, Daniel S. Shaw, Laurie Chassin, Leslie D. Leve, Anita Thapar, David Reiss, Misaki N. Natsuaki, Jenae M. Neiderhiser, Kathryn Lemery‐Chalfant and David Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.